Subscribe

Retirement savings gap could cost US government $1.3 trillion

Shortfalls in individuals' nest eggs will mean higher public assistance costs, decreased tax revenue, lower household spending and a decline in standards of living, a study finds.

America’s retirement crisis could cost the federal and state governments an estimated $1.3 trillion by 2040, according to a new analysis. 

Inadequate retirement savings will result in higher public assistance costs, decreased tax revenue, lower household spending and a decline in standards of living, according to a report done for the Pew Charitable Trusts.

The anticipated costs —  $964 billion for the federal government and $334 billion for states between 2021 and 2040 — are “relatively shocking,” John Scott, director of Pew’s retirement savings project, said during a presentation Thursday. 

The shortfall is being driven in part by demographics, with the share of households including someone 65 or older that has less than $75,000 in annual income —  a level the report said indicated financial vulnerability — expected to jump 43% to 33 million by 2040.

The report found that minor increases in savings habits by those “vulnerable” households could alleviate the anticipated strain to federal and state budgets. Saving an extra $140 a month, or about $1,685 annually, over 30 years, the retirement savings gap and additional taxpayer burden could be eliminated, according to the analysis. 

The research assumed an inflation-adjusted return of 5% on assets that shifted from a more aggressive to a more conservative portfolio over three decades. 

The study pointed to the growth of state-sponsored automated retirement savings accounts, which have been adopted in 12 states, as a way to help as many as 56 million private-sector employees without employer-sponsored retirement savings plans. Such auto-IRA programs usually automatically enroll employees, who can then opt out.

Unlike many retirement savings programs at large private companies, auto-IRAs are Roth accounts, funded with a small percentage of a worker’s after-tax paycheck. Users aren’t able to lower their taxable income by contributing to retirement savings on a pretax basis, as workers can in 401(k) plans, and there are no matching contributions from employers.

Here’s why lending products belong in client portfolios

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Fiduciary commitment should be table stakes

Speed and nature of new DOL rule has left many in the insurance industry fuming, losing sight of the impact on ordinary investors

Cresset adds two J.P. Morgan teams overseeing $5B

The two groups were among several former First Republic teams whose exits from J.P. Morgan were announced Friday.

Ascensus buying Vanguard small-business retirement offerings

The company is acquiring the Individual 401(k), Multi-SEP, and SIMPLE IRA plan businesses from Vanguard.

Raymond James adds advisor from Wells Fargo

South Florida-based advisor had been overseeing $105 million in client assets at Wells.

Dimon says AI could be ‘transformational’

JPMorgan Chase's CEO says AI's impact on the economy could equal that of the steam engine.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print