Are your clients willing to trade returns for impact? There’s a fair chance they will, according to new research from a global asset manager.
Forty percent of U.S. respondents to the seventh impact investing survey from American Century Investments said they would sacrifice higher returns if their investments were making an impact, rising 4% from the previous iteration of the study.
This puts American respondents above those in the U.K. (33%), Germany (31%), and Australia (29%) in this regard, but behind those in Singapore (47%). Across all countries polled, 67% of participants said they would sacrifice up to 10% of returns, most saying 6-10% would be their preference, but few would be willing to lose 16% or more.
But the report also found that interest in impact investing is declining across all markets included, although the U.S. saw the smallest decrease (-1%) while Australia saw the largest (-6%). While baby boomers’ interest has declined the most at -8% with Gen X at -5%, there is disparity among younger cohorts with millennials holding relatively steady at -1% but Gen Zs showing a -7% decrease.
There has also been a change in the driving cause behind impact investing. Healthcare has surpassed environment as the top concern overall.
In the U.S., greenwashing and the sustainability backlash both influenced interest in impact investing at higher levels than the prior year.
"In its earliest forms, impact investing often accepted lower expected returns to have a bigger impact, but our impact investment strategies emphasize sustainability-related attributes or outcomes in addition to delivering a financial return,” said Sarah Bratton Hughes, senior vice president and head of sustainable investing for American Century Investments. “Identifying impact-related factors that could affect a company's ability to stay competitive over the long term has the potential to add to returns. A willingness to give up as much as 10% of an expected return shows that impact investors expect to earn competitive returns and are making rational choices to realize an impact emphasis in addition to a financial return."
The deal marks Ground Control's second UK transaction in under two years as US wealth platforms race to stake out overseas territory.
Investors' tendency to choose external goalposts can seriously impact their odds of long-term success – and they might not even know it.
“We fear that it will be ‘open season’ from the plaintiffs’ bar on plan fiduciaries who are early adopters of alternative investments,” said Tim Collins, a partner at Duane Morris.
Industry report shows that there are now fewer firms as consolidation intensifies.
The firms building now have a head start that will be very difficult to close. The ones waiting are accumulating a debt they may not be able to repay.
As $84 trillion prepares to change hands, advisors who treat estate planning as peripheral are quietly building a sieve, not a book.
In volatile markets, the advisors who win aren't the ones with the best calls - they're the ones whose clients stay the course.
