Subscribe

Bob Reynolds reflects on future of 401(k) plans after the election

The Putnam CEO is concerned that the retirement plan system is an easy target if the government needs to raise money

Though Ted Benna is often called the father of 401(k) plans, having created the first one in the early 1980s, Bob Reynolds might be a more apt choice for the title. Reynolds was the creator of Fidelity’s 401(k) programs, which brought plans to the masses, and then he put together the defined-contribution businesses of Great-West, Putnam and JPMorgan to form the current juggernaut Empower Retirement.

With a change in the administration imminent, what does Reynolds, the CEO of Putnam, think about the future of the 401(k)system, rampant industry consolidation and the ability of workplace savings platforms to help participants with all financial matters?

Though 401(k) plans seem to be one of the few bipartisan issues, as reflected in the recently introduced Neal-Brady bill. Reynolds is concerned that the system is an easy target if the government needs to raise money. He mentioned proposals such as providing tax credits rather than deductions for businesses that offer 401(k)s, requiring that a percentage of participants’ savings go to a Roth, and imposing a financial transaction tax on 401(k)s as concerns.

Most important, according to Reynolds, is the need to make 401(k) plans easy and cost-effective for employers while limiting their liability because workers are 10 times more likely to save for retirement at work than on their own.

The SECURE Act was a good first step but Reynolds urges the government to make auto features required for all plans, not just new ones, as proposed in the Neal-Brady bill. If plans auto-enroll employees at a minimum contribution of 5% and then auto-escalate to a 10% contribution while using a professional managed investment like target-date funds, the accumulation issue will be solved. He also advocates for a federal rather than state-wide mandate.

Retirement income is still in the second or third inning, he said, and is not helped by the current low interest rates. Reynolds likes reverse mortgages because they allow older workers to keep saving and not tap into retirement accounts.

Workplace savings programs are the perfect place to administer financial wellness, which was a big driver for Empower’s acquisition of Personal Capital. Reynolds noted that through this acquisition, Empower offers participants the aggregation of assets, one-stop shopping and the integration of 401(k) savings accounts, which hold the second greatest portion of their capital for most people, after their homes. He mentioned that both Fidelity and Vanguard offer similar services.

Though some experts are concerned that too much record-keeper consolidation could limit choices, Reynolds said that there’s no need for 20-plus providers and that the system will remain healthy even with five to 10 choices.

After the Personal Capital acquisition, some experts believed that Empower would no longer buy traditional competitors to grow. But the purchase of MassMutual’s worksite savings business, driven by its focus on smaller plans, and then the acquisition of Fifth Third’s retirement division, for which Empower provided white-labeled service, proved otherwise.

Scale matters, Reynolds noted, and allows providers to invest, especially in technology to provide a rich digital experience to participants.

What gets Reynolds these days? The ability of the workplace savings system to enable more coverage and savings. Though 401(k) plans are a bipartisan issue mentioned frequently by President Trump in tweets and speeches, Reynolds is concerned that the government sees the almost $20 trillion in defined-contribution plans and IRAs as low-hanging fruit and a way to fund other initiatives.

Having created two of the largest defined-contribution providers, Fidelity and Empower, over the past 30 years, Reynolds has a unique perspective along with street cred. He notes that 401(k) plans have brought Main Street to Wall Street, deeply affecting the economy while funding growth. Hopefully the government will not be shortsighted and do what we tell participants not to do tap retirement savings to pay for today’s expenses.

[More: Chief investment officers outline future of DC plans]

Fred Barstein is founder and CEO of The Retirement Advisor University and The Plan Sponsor University. He is also a contributing editor for InvestmentNews’​ RPA Convergence newsletter.

Related Topics: , , ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Covid, convergence, consolidation and the 2021 RPA roundtables

Aggregators realize that in-plan retirement income solutions are needed, while CIOs understand that advisers need to be able to help participants navigate the myriad of benefits offered at work.

Chief investment officers critical to success of DC plans, participants

CIOs from the leading DC record keepers, aggregators and broker-dealers discussed their greatest opportunities and challenges.

RPAs need a new name to reach the next level

While 'retirement plan adviser' has been a good description of those who serve ERISA retirement plans, it's actually quite limiting to focus on the plan, rather than the participant.

Who will win the 401(k) battle in the 2020s?

The start of the 2020s has been dominated by the three Cs — Covid, convergence and consolidation. Government mandates could cause the small and startup plan market to explode, and RPA consolidation has blown up.

RPA aggregators focused on convergence, consolidation and cooperation

Unlike any other industry event, the RPA Aggregator event had no agenda. All participants were focused on the defined-contribution industry’s biggest opportunities and challenges.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print