Why traditional economic indicators failed so many this cycle

Many economists believe a recession is still a possibility, which has been stoked by the breakdown in traditionally reliable indicators.
SEP 19, 2016
Many economists hold the belief that a recession is still a possibility, which has been stoked by the breakdown in traditionally reliable economic indicators. These include economist favorites like the Industrial Production Index (IPI), the Baltic Dry Index (BDIY), the Change in Labor Market Conditions Index (LMCI) and the price of copper. But are these long standing indicators really accurate? Consider that we are multi-years into the dollar's rise and still, many economy watchers seemingly can't rework their models to interpret data for the extraordinarily strong U.S. currency and the effects it's having on global interactions and prices. We believe that indicators like the BDIY and copper have been rendered completely useless by the effects of the dollar, the oversupply of product and the current en vogue switch to service based economies across the world. The two most obvious examples of this significant shift are China and Saudi Arabia. Each of these countries' governments has realized the need and benefit of growing their impoverished middle class through the services sector instead of the highly volatile commodity and manufacturing sectors. And both countries have now begun the difficult and painful process by moving sovereign investments away from these areas, which only adds to the harm already being created by the dollar on the effectiveness of indicators that capture almost exclusively commodity related growth. Further, the IPI, which is the stalwart indicator for many economists, has been flashing bright red recession lights for months now. But unfortunately, this index is also disproportionately set towards industries that continue to be in great depression level downturns, yet represent little in the way of the makeup of our current service based economies. And its reliability is further compromised by a shifting and more efficient power grid and the prevalence of utility output as a component. In contrast, we think that the Chemical Activity Barometer, which was developed by the American Chemistry Council, to now be a far superior leading indicator to industrial production. It grabs items with more pertinent data for the makeup of the economy we now find ourselves in today. The “CAB” has been found to consistently lead the U.S. economy's business cycle given its early position in the supply chain versus a large metal and mining focus in the Industrial Production numbers. The CAB has been showing strong year-over-year growth and has been accelerating in the past few months. This is a very good sign for an eventual pickup in the more lagging IPI number. Finally, we come to the recently ugly looking LMCI which is a Fed favorite used to gauge the health of the jobs market. Over the past few months this index has been trending down and worrying many market participants, as well as the Fed. There are plenty of explanations for this. First, the working-age population is growing very slowly now that the two largest generations, Millennials and Baby Boomers, are very solidly already in the number. Second, the labor force participation rate will have a hard time growing substantially until lower income wages increase enough to get people excited about working again. That's why we think the trajectory of payroll employment will continue higher at a steady, although slower, pace with 100k plus months being the exception and not the norm. The bright spot in the employment picture continues to be wage growth, which for the last several years seem to focus on the very skilled higher paying jobs, but is now proliferating down to the lower income works. These higher wages for lower income workers, accompanied by minimum wage increases, could not only put more money in workers' pockets, but also help the labor force participation rate as well. The economic table as it is currently set, shows a lower growth, but incredibly stable environment, but only if you interpret the data with the strong dollar in mind. Brett F. Ewing is chief market strategist and S. Lance Mitchell is research director with First Franklin Financial Services

Latest News

The 2025 InvestmentNews Awards Excellence Awardees revealed
The 2025 InvestmentNews Awards Excellence Awardees revealed

From outstanding individuals to innovative organizations, find out who made the final shortlist for top honors at the IN awards, now in its second year.

Top RIA Cresset warns of 'inevitable' recession amid tariff uncertainty
Top RIA Cresset warns of 'inevitable' recession amid tariff uncertainty

Cresset's Susie Cranston is expecting an economic recession, but says her $65 billion RIA sees "great opportunity" to keep investing in a down market.

Edward Jones joins the crowd to sell more alternative investments
Edward Jones joins the crowd to sell more alternative investments

“There’s a big pull to alternative investments right now because of volatility of the stock market,” Kevin Gannon, CEO of Robert A. Stanger & Co., said.

Record RIA M&A activity marks strong start to 2025
Record RIA M&A activity marks strong start to 2025

Sellers shift focus: It's not about succession anymore.

IB+ Data Hub offers strategic edge for U.S. wealth advisors and RIAs advising business clients
IB+ Data Hub offers strategic edge for U.S. wealth advisors and RIAs advising business clients

Platform being adopted by independent-minded advisors who see insurance as a core pillar of their business.

SPONSORED Compliance in real time: Technology's expanding role in RIA oversight

RIAs face rising regulatory pressure in 2025. Forward-looking firms are responding with embedded technology, not more paperwork.

SPONSORED Advisory firms confront crossroads amid historic wealth transfer

As inheritances are set to reshape client portfolios and next-gen heirs demand digital-first experiences, firms are retooling their wealth tech stacks and succession models in real time.