Death watch gone awry

The Nebraska Supreme Court has ruled against a group of investors who tried to muscle a state guaranty association into paying about $1 million for the group's failed viatical investments.
MAY 24, 2009
The Nebraska Supreme Court has ruled against a group of investors who tried to muscle a state guaranty association into paying about $1 million for the group's failed viatical investments. A group of 26 Nebraska residents, led by Tex R. Harvey, invested in viatical settlements through Future First Financial Group of Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla., entering into purchase request agreements that required them to be named as beneficiaries of life insurance policies on the lives of others. These viatical settlements involved the sale of an infirm or elderly person's life insurance policy to an investor in return for a lump sum of cash. The investor, who pays the policy's premium for the duration of the insured's life, collects on the death benefit. Future First fell on hard times in 2002 when the state's securities and insurance regulators hit a group of its top executives with charges of racketeering, securities fraud and grand theft. The firm later collapsed as a result of “fraud, new medical developments and [policy sellers] not dying according to the expected schedule,” according to court documents. The firm later had its settlements provider license revoked by the Florida insurance department and fell under judicial conservatorship. In the Nebraska case, the investors raised the question of whether their investment losses were indeed covered by the state's guaranty association — the backup fund that is intended to protect the state's insurance consumers in the event of a carrier's insolvency. The state's Supreme Court found that Future First never paid into Nebraska's guaranty fund, nor was it ever licensed to do business there, meaning that the company isn't a “member insurer” and its purchase request agreements aren't covered by the state's fund. Furthermore, though Future First was supposed to name the investors as beneficiaries of the life policies in the purchase request agreements, none of these individuals were designated as such, according to court documents.

Latest News

Maryland bars advisor over charging excessive fees to clients
Maryland bars advisor over charging excessive fees to clients

Blue Anchor Capital Management and Pickett also purchased “highly aggressive and volatile” securities, according to the order.

Wave of SEC appointments signals regulatory shift with implications for financial advisors
Wave of SEC appointments signals regulatory shift with implications for financial advisors

Reshuffle provides strong indication of where the regulator's priorities now lie.

US insurers want to take a larger slice of the retirement market through the RIA channel
US insurers want to take a larger slice of the retirement market through the RIA channel

Goldman Sachs Asset Management report reveals sharpened focus on annuities.

Why DA Davidson's wealth vice chairman still follows his dad's investment advice
Why DA Davidson's wealth vice chairman still follows his dad's investment advice

Ahead of Father's Day, InvestmentNews speaks with Andrew Crowell.

401(k) participants seek advice, but few turn to financial advisors
401(k) participants seek advice, but few turn to financial advisors

Cerulli research finds nearly two-thirds of active retirement plan participants are unadvised, opening a potential engagement opportunity.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today’s choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave