Moody's to eye insurance companies' recapitalization efforts

As some insurers recently made stock and debt offerings in lieu of participating in the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, Moody’s Investors Service said that it will review the way these recapitalization options affect carriers’ ratings.
JUN 02, 2009
As some insurers recently made stock and debt offerings in lieu of participating in the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, Moody’s Investors Service said that it will review the way these recapitalization options affect carriers’ ratings. Three of the six insurance companies offered participation in TARP have already declined. They are Allstate Corp. of Northbrook, Ill., Ameriprise Financial Inc. of Minneapolis and Prudential Financial Inc. of Newark, N.J. Three others — Hartford (Conn.) Financial Services Group Inc., Lincoln National Corp. of Radnor, Pa., and Principal Financial Group of Des Moines, Iowa — are still reviewing their options. Although many carriers have tried to strengthen their credit profiles by cutting back on riskier business segments and raising cash reserves, they have also tried to increase their capital and liquidity buffers by issuing debt, equity and hybrid securities in the capital markets, Moody’s noted in a report. The capital markets were less of an option at the height of last fall’s economic strife, but as the market climate has improved, a number of carriers have been able to announce offerings. They include Principal Financial and Prudential Financial. Aflac Inc. in Columbus, Ga., reportedly considered that possibility as well via a share offering, but the idea was placed on the back burner last week, according to published reports. TARP-like hybrid securities, as well as traditional market-placed debt or equity or cash raised at a viable cost could help carriers’ financial flexibility at this time. New York-based Moody’s said that when assessing ratings, it would consider the purposes for which the capital raised will be used. For instance, will it be kept at the holding-company level for a liquidity cushion or added to operating companies to raise their capital? In the former situation, the funding would be considered operating leverage, while under the latter scenario, Moody’s would consider the capital to be financial leverage. Nevertheless, continuing credit concerns about carriers’ profitability and risk management will still remain even after an increase in capital, the agency said.

Latest News

Is Wall Street's AI risk analysis right for RIA portfolios?
Is Wall Street's AI risk analysis right for RIA portfolios?

Anthropic's Millennium partnership moves AI from reactive tool to proactive risk monitor — but other wealth tech leaders question its fit for RIA practices.

AI is resetting trust in wealth services, says Advisor360's new CEO
AI is resetting trust in wealth services, says Advisor360's new CEO

Milind Mehere offers perspective on why ambient AI, not smarter models, will define the next decade of wealth tech.

Ex-indy rep turned phony finfluencer gets two years in prison
Ex-indy rep turned phony finfluencer gets two years in prison

Kenneth Thom, 42, reinvented himself as a finfluencer known as “K Money.”

Trump sued over Truth Social's paid early-access data feed
Trump sued over Truth Social's paid early-access data feed

A press-freedom lawsuit filed in Manhattan challenges the president's $100,000-a-month Truth API service used by trading firms.

Zero-fee IRAs quietly cost savers up to $1,400 a year, PensionBee study finds
Zero-fee IRAs quietly cost savers up to $1,400 a year, PensionBee study finds

Research reveals six hidden costs inside "zero-fee" IRAs, with one investment mistake potentially amounting to $170,000 over a 30-year period.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income