Most annuity holders will duck Obamacare's tax goose

Most annuity holders will duck Obamacare's tax goose
Few make enough money to be hit by 3.8% surcharge; did insurers cry wolf?
JUL 13, 2012
Health care reform will hit investment income — including income from annuities — with a tax, but advisers and clients likely will continue using the products. The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in favor of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on Thursday will also put through a 3.8% tax, slugged the “unearned-income Medicare contribution,” on investment income. That includes income from interest, dividends, rent, annuities and royalties. The surtax will apply to couples earning more than $250,000, as well as individuals who are earning more than $200,000. Though the tax met fierce opposition from industry groups in the past, attorneys are saying that the 3.8% charge won't hit as many annuity holders as once expected. “While it's unfortunate the 3.8% tax is there, in reality, it won't make much of a difference,” said Joseph F. McKeever, partner at Davis & Harman LLP and expert on the taxation of insurance products. “There are very few people who own annuities and who have income over the $250,000 threshold.” RELATED ITEM Eight VA trends worth noting » A recent Gallup Inc. poll revealed that only 4% of nonqualified-annuity holders have adjusted gross income over the $250,000 mark, he added. That finding sharply contrasts with the arguments from groups such as the American Council for Life Insurers, who signed a joint letter in 2010 arguing that the 3.8% tax “would serve as a disincentive to save in a product that uniquely allows an individual to accumulate retirement savings and to guarantee that savings can never be outlived.” Steve Brostoff, spokesman for the ACLI, said the group has no further comment on the recent court decision. Financial advisers noted that despite the additional tax on income, they expect to continue using the products. “We use annuities as longevity insurance, so the tax ramifications are secondary to that,” said Kevin Distad, an adviser at Counsel Wealth Management Inc. Still, the additional surtax could compound other problems for the wealthiest of clients. “It's going to be combined with the Bush-era tax cuts' expiring, so someone in the top bracket of 35% could go up to at least 40%,” Mr. Distad noted. “That 3.8% tax on top of the marginal tax rate increasing could be significant, so it might be a good time to review your portfolios.”

Latest News

Advisor moves: Raymond James lands $1.25B team as Merrill loses two
Advisor moves: Raymond James lands $1.25B team as Merrill loses two

Iowa's Greenwood Wealth Partners exits D.M. Kelly as UBS and Ameriprise win Merrill Lynch recruits in California and Florida

Never a losing day: CFTC alleges $950 million forex Ponzi scheme
Never a losing day: CFTC alleges $950 million forex Ponzi scheme

Less than 1% of pool funds went to actual trading, CFTC says

Fintech bytes: Northwestern Mutual picks Jump for enterprise AI
Fintech bytes: Northwestern Mutual picks Jump for enterprise AI

Plus, SEIA builds a governed data foundation for its in-house AI and Snappy Kraken debuts a read-only marketing coworker for advisors.

People moves: AllianceBernstein names Onur Erzan as next CEO
People moves: AllianceBernstein names Onur Erzan as next CEO

Broadridge, Wedbush and Alaris Acquisitions have also filled senior wealth management roles with hires from J.P. Morgan, Osaic and SageView.

SPONSORED In the Age of AI, Trust Becomes the Advisor's Greatest Asset

As AI makes financial information more accessible than ever, Lana Hock explains why human judgment, trust, and empathy remain the qualities clients value most in a financial advisor

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains