Regulators anticipate new rules for insurers

FEB 24, 2009
Thanks to the global crisis, insurers and other financial companies will likely see new regulations that will greater restrict their activities, several regulators and experts agreed yesterday at an industry conference. For instance, one focus is to develop a method to calibrate the risks that financial services companies take, and to establish criteria for intervention at companies that are too big or too interconnected to fail, said Thomas Selman, a panelist at a session of NAVA Inc.’s annual marketing conference in New York. A “failure to manage risk and protect investors are two sides of the same coin,” said Mr. Selman, executive vice president of regulatory policy at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. of Washington and New York. The idea of a single regulator to oversee systemic risk at the federal level might make sense for the marketplace, but only if there is collaboration with state insurance regulators, said Therese Vaughan, chief executive of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners of Kansas City, Mo. “In our state-based system, we have diverse eyes on each issue, and because of that, we’re less likely to miss things and less likely to come down on the side of dogmatic solutions,” she said. “It has worked for 150 years.” However, John Sununu, former Republican senator of New Hampshire, said that the financial crisis warrants a new approach and a new regulatory system that mandates a state-federal partnership, perhaps through the proposed optional federal charter for carriers. An optional federal charter would enable insurance companies and reinsurance companies, as well as agents and brokers, to choose a system of federal chartering, licensing, regulation and supervision or they could continue to be regulated by the states. “I think the dual regulatory system worked reasonably well in banking, and can — and will — work in the insurance industry,” Mr. Sununu said. “It’s not a question of who can best protect consumers, but it should be about finding the appropriate level for regulation to occur, and developing systems that will allow businesses to compete on a national basis.” NAVA is based in Reston, Va.

Latest News

Why fixed income still belongs in your clients' portfolios
Why fixed income still belongs in your clients' portfolios

In an era of AI euphoria and market FOMO, getting back to basics with fixed income may be the most contrarian and most important move advisors can make.

Voya expands advisor managed accounts to add private market assets
Voya expands advisor managed accounts to add private market assets

Voya Financial adds private equity, credit and real estate options to its AMA program, building on support for looser federal investment rules in retirement accounts.

With executives leaving, Osaic’s Reid now in the spotlight
With executives leaving, Osaic’s Reid now in the spotlight

Shannon Reid, president of Osaic and the network’s number two executive, has plenty of challenges, industry executives said.

Investors sue crypto fund and platform, alleging $1.5 million never returned
Investors sue crypto fund and platform, alleging $1.5 million never returned

Auditors flagged the commingling. The COO allegedly knew. Investors kept getting the pitch

Wells Fargo nabs $1.7B RBC advisor team, loses two teams to LPL
Wells Fargo nabs $1.7B RBC advisor team, loses two teams to LPL

The advisors on the move include two brothers leading a family practice in Connecticut, and a husband-and-wife tandem working with business owners in the West Coast.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.