Suit: Prudential made $500M off vets' death-benefit money

Lawsuit claims insurer profited mightily off retained-asset accounts; lump-sum payment or not?
MAR 01, 2011
A lawsuit accusing Prudential Insurance Co. of America of improperly collecting interest on unpaid veterans' life-insurance benefits was expanded to include claims of fraud. The plaintiffs, seeking to have the case certified as a class action on behalf of 60,000 beneficiaries of military life insurance policies, filed an amended complaint today adding the fraud claims and additional claimants. The case was originally filed July 29 in federal court in Springfield, Massachusetts. The suit claims Prudential fails to pay beneficiaries in a lump sum as required by U.S. law and the language of the policies, instead encouraging them to leave the money in accounts with the company, which pays them a small amount of interest. “The amount Prudential has made through this misconduct is believed to be half a billion dollars or more,” the amended complaint said. The plaintiffs, who are the beneficiaries of eight military life insurance policies, said Prudential puts death benefits into “Alliance Accounts,” which pay only 0.5 percent to 1.5 percent interest. The company invests the money at a higher rate of return and keeps the difference, according to the suit. Bob DeFillippo, a spokesman for Newark, New Jersey-based Prudential Financial Inc., declined to comment on the suit. He said the company informs death-benefit beneficiaries of their payment options and that they can immediately withdraw all the money from their Alliance Accounts and invest it wherever they choose. ‘Lump-Sum' The beneficiaries said Prudential “fraudulently informs beneficiaries that this Alliance Account scheme constitutes a ‘lump-sum' payment as required by law.” Instead, the company keeps the money in its general account, paying only when the beneficiaries write drafts on the account, they claim. More than 100 insurance carriers earn investment income on $28 billion owed to life insurance beneficiaries, Bloomberg Markets magazine reported last month. The case is Lucey v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 10-30163, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts (Springfield).

Latest News

Giant Cambridge group in Pennsylvania bolts to LPL
Giant Cambridge group in Pennsylvania bolts to LPL

Conte Wealth Advisors reportedly has $1.4 billion in client assets and 20 advisors.

MAI Capital expands in California with $551 million OG Private Wealth deal
MAI Capital expands in California with $551 million OG Private Wealth deal

The Cleveland-based RIA's latest tie-up extends the firm's national footprint into the Golden State, where opinions continue to be split over a contentious billionaire wealth tax proposal.

Advisor moves: Missouri-based LPL team decamps to Osaic in full-circle succession
Advisor moves: Missouri-based LPL team decamps to Osaic in full-circle succession

Meanwhile, Cetera has welcomed a family-run practice from Commonwealth, and a Merrill advisor joins an existing UBS team in Connecticut.

Wealth Enhancement extends acquisition streak with Washington state deal
Wealth Enhancement extends acquisition streak with Washington state deal

The Olympia, Washington firm's retirement planning expertise reinforces the consolidator's growth momentum to exceed $160 billion in client assets.

Building AI you can trust in wealth management
Building AI you can trust in wealth management

Beyond content generation and execution, firms that can offer answers around governance, transparency, and supervision are set to pull ahead in the next leg of the AI race.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income