Suit: Prudential made $500M off vets' death-benefit money

Lawsuit claims insurer profited mightily off retained-asset accounts; lump-sum payment or not?
MAR 01, 2011
A lawsuit accusing Prudential Insurance Co. of America of improperly collecting interest on unpaid veterans' life-insurance benefits was expanded to include claims of fraud. The plaintiffs, seeking to have the case certified as a class action on behalf of 60,000 beneficiaries of military life insurance policies, filed an amended complaint today adding the fraud claims and additional claimants. The case was originally filed July 29 in federal court in Springfield, Massachusetts. The suit claims Prudential fails to pay beneficiaries in a lump sum as required by U.S. law and the language of the policies, instead encouraging them to leave the money in accounts with the company, which pays them a small amount of interest. “The amount Prudential has made through this misconduct is believed to be half a billion dollars or more,” the amended complaint said. The plaintiffs, who are the beneficiaries of eight military life insurance policies, said Prudential puts death benefits into “Alliance Accounts,” which pay only 0.5 percent to 1.5 percent interest. The company invests the money at a higher rate of return and keeps the difference, according to the suit. Bob DeFillippo, a spokesman for Newark, New Jersey-based Prudential Financial Inc., declined to comment on the suit. He said the company informs death-benefit beneficiaries of their payment options and that they can immediately withdraw all the money from their Alliance Accounts and invest it wherever they choose. ‘Lump-Sum' The beneficiaries said Prudential “fraudulently informs beneficiaries that this Alliance Account scheme constitutes a ‘lump-sum' payment as required by law.” Instead, the company keeps the money in its general account, paying only when the beneficiaries write drafts on the account, they claim. More than 100 insurance carriers earn investment income on $28 billion owed to life insurance beneficiaries, Bloomberg Markets magazine reported last month. The case is Lucey v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 10-30163, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts (Springfield).

Latest News

Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave
Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave

The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.

Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds
Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds

Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.

Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits
Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits

CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.

BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom
BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom

The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.

UBS moves toward full-service US bank as plans to extend wealth business
UBS moves toward full-service US bank as plans to extend wealth business

Employee accounts, crypto trials and job cuts frame a pivotal year for the Swiss lender.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.