The Hartford insists it has enough capital

The Hartford (Conn.) Financial Services Group Inc. today reassured the public that it indeed has sufficient capital — though it is lower than previously forecasted.
NOV 03, 2008
The Hartford (Conn.) Financial Services Group Inc. today reassured the public that it indeed has sufficient capital — though it is lower than previously forecasted. The insurer said that if the Standard and Poor’s 500 stock index were to close at 900 at the end of the year, its estimated capital margin would be $2 billion. That is down from its Oct. 6 estimate of $3.5 billion were the market to close at 1,165 — the closing level Sept. 30 — at the end of the year. The company noted that its parent and property/casualty subsidiaries have some $1.5 billion in capital resources, which it could tap to boost its risk-based capital ratio, pending approval from the Connecticut Department of Insurance. The Hartford can also hit up its $500 million Glen Meadow Pass-Through Trust contingent-capital facility and access $1.9 billion of capacity under its revolving-credit facility. Plummeting equity markets have wreaked havoc on The Hartford’s third-quarter results, raising questions among analysts of whether there is enough money to back up the carrier’s variable annuities with guarantees. The carrier took a $932 million charge related to its annuities during the quarter. The reassurance arrives five days after The Hartford’s earnings call Oct. 29. Liz Zlatkus, finance chief of The Hartford, and Ramani Ayer, chief executive, came under fire last Wednesday after analysts pelted them with questions about the company’s statutory and risk-based capital levels. They were concerned about the equity market’s impact on the firm’s capital position. At the time, Ms. Zlatkus provided a risk-based capital ratio estimate range of 300% and 400%, assuming that the S&P 500 closed between 800 and 900 at the end of the year. Now the company says that the range for the Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co. in Simsbury, Conn. — the unit that provides life insurance and annuities — would have a risk-based capital ratio of 440% if the S&P 500 closed at 900, and 345% at 800. Although 300% would be far above the levels that require regulatory intercession, it would likely be below the 325% ratio ratings agencies use when they give AA-level ratings, which the carrier currently has.

Latest News

Forbes and Shook pull the plug on rankings, events, in 2026
Forbes and Shook pull the plug on rankings, events, in 2026

The Forbes rankings are highly sought after by some advisors and firms for marketing purposes.

Advisor moves: Cresset enters Boca Raton with $4 billion UBS team addition
Advisor moves: Cresset enters Boca Raton with $4 billion UBS team addition

Meanwhile, an advisor tuck-in from Edward Jones expands Kestra's Washington, D.C.-area presence, and Janney deepens its Connecticut footprint with an experienced Wells Fargo advisor.

Kovack Financial Network launches private succession platform for advisors
Kovack Financial Network launches private succession platform for advisors

KFN Succession Center pairs advisors weighing retirement with buyers, as next-gen affordability keeps eroding industry-wide.

Regulation lags rising private credit risks as retail access widens
Regulation lags rising private credit risks as retail access widens

New CFA Institute research calls for tougher valuation rules and suitability standards as private credit funds court wealth management clients.

LPL Financial, Raymond James land advisors managing $470M
LPL Financial, Raymond James land advisors managing $470M

Michigan father-son team with nearly 50 years of combined experience joins LPL, while a New Jersey advisor moves from Ameriprise to RJFS.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income