Geithner eases fears about mutual fund regulation — sort of

Geithner eases fears about mutual fund regulation — sort of
Treasury Secretary addresses issue of whether funds are too big too fail; well, are they or aren't they?
MAY 06, 2011
Based on what Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said yesterday, it seems pretty unlikely that all mutual funds are going to be designated as systemically important financial institutions under Dodd-Frank. In a question and answer session at the Investment Company Institute's Annual General Membership Meeting Wednesday, Paul Schott Stevens, president and CEO of the ICI, asked the Treasury Secretary whether he is considering a broad or narrow definition of what a systemically important financial institution should be. In response, Mr. Geithner said the debate shouldn't be about how broad or narrow the designation is. “It should be about whether an institution can have the same inherent risk that comes with borrowing short so you can invest long term in a size that matters.” Specifically, Mr. Geithner wants to make sure that institutions that are acting as investment banks — through the use of leverage — are regulated as such. What Mr. Geithner wants is very important to the mutual fund business. Under the Dodd-Frank legislation, Congress created the Financial Stability Oversight Council, a group of financial regulators to identify institutions that potentially could destabilize markets. The FSOC is expected to designate which institutions — both banks and, importantly non-banks — could pose substantial risk to the system by year-end. Mr. Geithner is chair of that council. The mutual fund industry has been fighting to keep itself out of the FSOC's sights, claiming that the funds don't inherently pose the same kinds of liquidity challenges to the system that other institutions do. At yesterday's gathering, Mr. Geithner seemed to assuage those fears. He noted that establishing a broad designation could pose problems. For example, the FSOC wants to make sure it has a system in place which prevents a company from operating as a bank one day, and then flipping their charter to become a thrift simply to avoid regulation. “This is not something you can lock in and never change," he said, "because the market will adapt."

Latest News

SEC and state regulators tighten grip on fraud in fiscal 2026
SEC and state regulators tighten grip on fraud in fiscal 2026

Broker-dealer enforcement actions surged 66% as the SEC and state regulators cracked down on Ponzi schemes and digital asset fraud.

Marsh acquires Wilshire to deepen wealth advisor reach
Marsh acquires Wilshire to deepen wealth advisor reach

The deal adds $221 billion in AUM and bolsters Marsh's alternatives and model portfolio capabilities for advisors.

Gen X retirement savings facing ‘collision of financial pressures’ from family obligations
Gen X retirement savings facing ‘collision of financial pressures’ from family obligations

New Jackson research finds multi-generational financial obligations are leaving pre-retirees dangerously off track.

When the sunset deal dims the value
When the sunset deal dims the value

Sanctuary Wealth’s Vince Fertitta examines what wirehouse advisors may leave behind when a career ends in deferred compensation rather than a sale

Osaic CEO Jamie Price sees W-2 channel growing to a third of assets
Osaic CEO Jamie Price sees W-2 channel growing to a third of assets

Osaic's Empowered Independence reached roughly $20 billion in a year and a half as succession pressure pushes advisors toward becoming W-2 employees

SPONSORED Best Practices for Engaging Women Around Alternatives

Growing wealth, evolving priorities, and untapped opportunities are reshaping how women approach long-term investing.

SPONSORED Built on insurance experience to deliver on long-term promises

Knighthead Life entered the market with a competitive MYGA. A strong launch earned advisor confidence and paved the way for FIAs.