Mutual funds not in 'too big to fail' category

NOV 24, 2013
To prevent a repeat of the financial crisis, the federal government is continuing the process of identifying financial firms that are deemed “too big to fail.” Firms so identified are subject to extra scrutiny by regulators and may have to meet higher capital requirements and other financial metrics that smaller companies in their industry won't have to meet, conceivably putting these larger firms at a competitive disadvantage. The Financial Stability Oversight Council, which was created under the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, ultimately will decide which institutions will be designated as systemically important. To help them in the process, Dodd-Frank also authorized the creation of the Office of Financial Research, which is providing data and analysis to the FSOC.

MUTUAL FUNDS TARGETED

Although several large banks have already been identified as too big to fail, along with insurance giants American International Group Inc. and Prudential Financial Inc., the Office of Financial Research is now considering broadening the scope of the designation to include large mutual fund companies such as BlackRock Inc. and Fidelity Investments. These asset managers are pushing back, arguing that they don't present the type of risk that the FSOC was designed to address. Yes, they are big and are responsible for investing huge amounts of assets on which Americans depend to help reach their financial goals. But there are many big firms in the United States, and many of them are important players in the economy. Should all of them be labeled too big to fail? Size alone should not and cannot be the single determining factor as to whether a company is considered systemically important. Perhaps the strongest argument that firms such as BlackRock and Fidelity can make is that unlike many of the large institutions already identified as too big too fail, these firms didn't need a bailout during the financial crisis. In other words, history is on their side. If in the final analysis, if the Office of Financial Research recommends that these asset managers be deemed too big to fail, cooler heads at the FSOC should prevail and the recommendation should be rejected.

Latest News

Why fixed income still belongs in your clients' portfolios
Why fixed income still belongs in your clients' portfolios

In an era of AI euphoria and market FOMO, getting back to basics with fixed income may be the most contrarian and most important move advisors can make.

Voya expands advisor managed accounts to add private market assets
Voya expands advisor managed accounts to add private market assets

Voya Financial adds private equity, credit and real estate options to its AMA program, building on support for looser federal investment rules in retirement accounts.

With executives leaving, Osaic’s Reid now in the spotlight
With executives leaving, Osaic’s Reid now in the spotlight

Shannon Reid, president of Osaic and the network’s number two executive, has plenty of challenges, industry executives said.

Investors sue crypto fund and platform, alleging $1.5 million never returned
Investors sue crypto fund and platform, alleging $1.5 million never returned

Auditors flagged the commingling. The COO allegedly knew. Investors kept getting the pitch

Wells Fargo nabs $1.7B RBC advisor team, loses two teams to LPL
Wells Fargo nabs $1.7B RBC advisor team, loses two teams to LPL

The advisors on the move include two brothers leading a family practice in Connecticut, and a husband-and-wife tandem working with business owners in the West Coast.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.