Chris Vizzi, CFP®, Co-Founding Partner at South Coast Investment Advisors, explains how 1031 exchanges are shifting from simple tax deferral to a sophisticated wealth-building tool. He highlights why DSTs and 721 UpREITs demand institutional-level scrutiny, disciplined underwriting, and cycle-tested sponsors. Vizzi shows how affluent families can preserve income, reduce risk, and transition from active ownership to generational legacy—by thinking like institutions, not landlords.
In real estate investing, experience isn’t measured in years, it’s measured in cycles. Those who lived through 1990, 2008, and 2020 tend to carry a different kind of muscle memory. They know that leverage, liquidity, and underwriting discipline determine outcomes far more than whatever the market is excited about in the moment.
That mindset matters today. As more money pours into Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) and 721 UpREIT structures, the 1031 landscape is changing quickly. The marketing looks institutional on the surface, but the actual execution across the industry often tells a different story.
The opportunity in this space is real. So is the risk. A surprising number of investors enter these vehicles understanding only the tax benefit, not the mechanics or the limitations. The structure is important, but the manager behind the property is just as important, if not more so.
A 1031 exchange, created under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, allows investors to defer capital gains taxes when they sell an investment property and reinvest the proceeds into another “like-kind” property of equal or greater value.
Institutions have used this rule for decades to preserve capital and compound wealth. Only in the past several years has this same approach become widely accessible to individual investors through the Delaware Statutory Trust, or DST, structure.
For families who spent years actively managing their own real estate, a 1031 exchange can become a bridge from the hands-on stage of ownership to the legacy stage. It lets them step away from what many landlords jokingly call the “Terrible T’s” of property management: tenants, termites, toilets, trash, and the constant phone calls that follow. And it does this while preserving the tax advantages that made real estate appealing in the first place.
Instead of selling a property, triggering a large taxable gain, and watching a significant portion of their equity disappear to taxes, investors can transfer those proceeds into multiple DST investments. Each DST usually holds a single institutional-grade asset. Minimums typically start around $100,000, which allows many families to build a diversified portfolio across different property types, regions, and sponsors.
There is a trade-off. Investors give up control. DSTs are passive, illiquid, and driven entirely by the sponsor’s execution of the business plan. Once invested, you are along for the ride, and the timeline is not yours to dictate.
However, the benefits can be meaningful. Income continues. Diversification increases. Tax deferral remains intact. And if the investment is held until death, heirs may receive a full step-up in basis that eliminates the accumulated capital gains liability.
For many long-time owners, that trade-off reflects the natural evolution of their wealth. It shifts their focus from active management to passive stewardship and gives them a path to preserve both income and legacy.
DSTs work because they follow the guidelines of IRS Revenue Ruling 2004-86, which established the legal foundation for them to qualify as like-kind property inside a 1031 exchange. The same ruling also created strict limitations. A DST cannot refinance. It cannot raise new equity. It cannot renegotiate major lease terms or initiate material capital projects after closing. Once the trust is formed, the structure is essentially fixed.
Because of those limits, the initial underwriting needs to be nearly flawless.
The best institutional sponsors understand this. They run stress tests. They model rent declines, rate increases, and cap rate expansion. They build reserves that anticipate the full life of the asset. They assume things will get harder, not easier.
Great advisors do the same when evaluating these offerings. Their job is not to promote the DST structure. Their job is to underwrite the deal. That means digging into the debt terms, understanding growth assumptions, reviewing reserves, and examining what kind of capital the sponsor has at risk. It also means asking whether the sponsor has been tested by more than one market cycle.
DSTs that fared well during the Great Financial Crisis were conservative from the start. The ones that failed were the ones built on optimism instead of durability. Investors are not just buying a property; they are buying the judgment and discipline of the sponsor. Advisors who understand that distinction place their clients in a much better position for success.
Among all the property types available through DSTs, multifamily continues to stand out. Construction starts have fallen sharply. Financing for new development remains tight. Population growth keeps leaning toward the Sun Belt and other diversified economic centers. All of this keeps supply limited while long-term demand remains steady.
Institutional capital has already noticed. Managers like KKR and Blackstone have quietly returned to the multifamily market, buying stabilized assets at pricing levels that reflect attractive long-term value. Their activity signals something important: what they see is not a temporary window, but the early stages of a durable trend.
For advisors building DST portfolios, the logic is straightforward. Multifamily properties often exhibit relatively stable occupancy, durable tenant demand, and a connection to demographic trends that have historically supported long-term rental needs. That does not eliminate risk, but it explains why institutions frequently treat multifamily as a core allocation. As always, the differentiator is sponsor discipline. Properties with conservative leverage, appropriate reserves, and experienced operators may be better positioned to navigate changing market conditions, although outcomes will always vary.
No real estate sector is risk-free. Nevertheless, multifamily continues to play a central role in many institutionally constructed 1031 portfolios, particularly for investors who prioritize income consistency and long-term stability over short-term market movement.
The 721 UpREIT structure allows DST investors to contribute their interests in exchange for operating-partnership units of a REIT. It has become increasingly common in the marketplace. While it can provide continued tax deferral within a different structure, it is sometimes presented as offering broader liquidity than may ultimately be available. Actual liquidity can vary depending on the REIT’s policies, market conditions, and other factors.
Once an investor moves into a REIT through a 721 transaction, they generally lose the ability to complete future 1031 exchanges. Their experience is then influenced by the REIT’s valuation methodology, distribution practices, and redemption framework. Some non-traded REITs include upfront fees or internal valuation adjustments that may take time to absorb. Redemption programs can also be limited, suspended, or modified during periods of market stress, which may restrict access to liquidity when demand is elevated.
The structure is not bad. The challenge is that expectations often do not match reality. Older investors frequently enter 721s for estate planning purposes, expecting to simplify the process for their heirs. But when heirs inherit, receive a step-up in basis, and then try to redeem, they may discover that liquidity is limited or delayed. Sponsors rarely emphasize this, but advisors should.
There is also a demographic shift underway. The average DST or UpREIT investor today is in their seventies. Over the next decade, billions of dollars of deferred-gain real estate will transition to heirs who may not want to remain in long-duration, income-oriented vehicles. If many investors try to redeem at once, pricing pressure and delays could follow.
Institutional investors review redemption mechanics, leverage ratios, and NAV methodologies before investing. 1031 and 721 investors should do the same. The question is not whether a 721 UpREIT is good or bad. The real question is whether it aligns with the investor’s time horizon, liquidity preference, and goals for the next generation.
The 1031 exchange remains one of the most effective tools in the U.S. tax code for preserving and compounding real-asset wealth. DSTs and 721s are not strategies in themselves. They are vehicles. The difference between a successful outcome and a disappointing one often comes down to underwriting quality, sponsor transparency, and the advisor’s ability to connect tax law, market structure, and family objectives.
Great advisors bring institutional thinking into a personal context. They understand how real estate behaves through cycles. They know how to integrate tax strategy with estate planning and capital markets. They focus on risk before return and ask the harder questions that most investors never think to ask.
When practiced this way, a 1031 exchange becomes more than a way to avoid taxes. It becomes a tool for generational planning, allowing wealth to move from active creation to passive stewardship without losing its structural integrity.
As the next real estate cycle develops, the advantage will belong to those who think like institutions: disciplined, data-aware, and prepared for change. For families transitioning from managing properties to managing wealth, the real goal is not just deferral. The real goal is legacy.
Disclosures
This material reflects the opinions of Chris Vizzi at the time of publication and is subject to change without notice. The information provided is for general educational purposes only and is not intended to serve as investment, tax, financial, or legal advice. Investors should consult with their investment professional, attorney, accountant, or tax advisor regarding their specific situation. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of Independent Financial Group, LLC, its affiliates, officers, or directors.
Vanilla is extending its estate planning tech to Callan Family Office's ultra-high-net-worth business, while WealthFeed's organic growth engine will now be available to roughly 100 advisors at The Mather Group.
“We are helping families take an important first step toward building a financial foundation for the next generation,” said Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson
Richard Brothers Financial Advisors joins the fee-only RIA, adding its first Maine office and $240 million in client assets
Cleveland RIA grows to $68 billion in assets as Philadelphia team, deepening its high-net-worth and retirement-plan practice.
Financial planning leaders say unresolved rules on fees, Roth conversions and financial aid complicate comparisons with 529 plans.
Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income
Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.
