When I meet with younger clients today, I am seeing a shift I did not expect a decade ago. It is not just that digital natives have better tools for tracking markets or doing their own research. It is that a meaningful share of them have moved their gambling instincts out of sportsbooks and into financial markets, particularly prediction markets, and they are calling it investing.
This trend really took hold during COVID. With sports on pause, a lot of young people who would normally be betting on football or basketball games started putting that same energy into markets instead. It snowballed from there. When I was a kid, the equivalent was Party Poker, everyone in high school was playing digital poker online. Today they are betting on the outcome of elections, Fed funds futures, and other events through prediction markets. Regulators may classify these products as investments, but for the people using them, the psychology is identical to sports betting.
That is not entirely a bad thing. It gets younger people in the door of platforms where they can eventually learn how real markets work. But it also teaches them that investing and gambling are interchangeable, and that they should feel good about speculating because they believe they are investing rather than gambling. Separating those two mindsets is a big part of my job now.
The tools available to younger investors today are dramatically better than anything available to previous generations, and that is both a benefit and a real risk. Those same tools can flood a non-professional with data they do not know how to use. Add in a steady stream of finance content on YouTube and social media, and you get an environment where anyone can build a platform and sound convincing without actually knowing what they are talking about.
We all have a threshold for how much new information we can absorb before decision-making starts to break down. When that threshold is crossed, it can trigger something close to a survival instinct, a feeling of being overwhelmed that shuts down good judgment. Part of my role is acting as a filter, helping clients understand which pieces of information actually matter to their long-term goals and which are just noise, a point I explored further in why uncertainty is making behavioral coaching more valuable than ever. A 30 or 40-year-old client does not need to react to what markets did this morning. They need to stay focused on the multi-decade trend that will actually shape their outcome, and younger investors are not the only ones who struggle here. I see the same doom-scrolling pattern in clients well into their 60s, sometimes worse, because digital natives are often quicker to spot manipulated or exaggerated content than older clients are.
I do not think the answer is telling younger clients to avoid prediction markets, cryptocurrency, or other speculative products altogether. It is about how those activities fit inside a total wealth plan. Give a younger client a defined, contained space to scratch that itch if they want to, without letting it put their long-term plan at risk.
That matters more for younger investors than they usually realize, because this is the most valuable investing time they will ever have. It is the longest runway for compounding they will get. A costly mistake made early does not just cost money in the moment, it compounds against them for decades, which is one reason I have written about protecting client assets in the age of AI and digital fraud. Many young investors do not appreciate that when a speculative bet goes wrong, the consequences are magnified over time in a way that is much harder to recover from than they assume.
Having an actual financial plan in place matters here too, even for a 25-year-old just getting started. The old approach of telling a young client to save 10 to 15 percent of their income and check back in a decade does not hold up anymore. A real plan, with milestones and regular check-ins, gives clients a way to measure whether they are on track that has nothing to do with what the market did this week.
Access to products and market information is no longer where advisors add value. That part of the business has been commoditized, and free platforms already give retail investors tools that would have impressed a professional twenty years ago. Where advisors matter now is in the relational and behavioral work, helping clients understand the implications of an impulsive decision before they make it, rather than lecturing them after the fact.
The industry is moving in that direction, and it needs to keep going, a shift I outlined in more detail in why the future of advice is becoming more human, not less. Firms that still define their value by performance against a benchmark are going to struggle as that kind of access becomes free everywhere. The advisors who last will be the ones who can connect financial planning to how clients actually behave under uncertainty.
South Korea's largest life insurer is pursuing a $4.4 billion stake in PFG, one of the top three 401(k) providers in the US.
Advisors can prompt the AI agent to model a client's potential Roth conversions, home sales, income shifts, and state moves.
New integration flags non-compliant language in AI-generated meeting notes as regulators sharpen focus on advisor recordkeeping.
They settled the same day the SEC sued - but the penalty is still unset.
The fee-only RIA's ninth deal of the year builds on record 2026 M&A activity and a minority staking investment from Hamilton Lane.
Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains
Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income
