The importance of overcoming political hurdles to addressing global challenges and ensuring better outcomes for society could barely have been better highlighted this week.
In its latest report, climate scientists at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned of “a rapidly closing window of opportunity to secure a liveable and sustainable future” as they cautioned that temperature rises are “more likely than not” to reach 1.5°C “in the near term.”
The IPCC report was published on the same day, Monday, that President Joe Biden issued his first presidential veto blocking legislation that would have precluded U.S. retirement plans from considering environmental, social and governance factors, including the impacts of climate change.
Congressional efforts to block the Department of Labor’s rule allowing ESG factors in investment decision-making — removing Trump-era restrictions — came despite repeated demonstrations of how important such factors can be helping investors to identify opportunities and manage risks effectively.
We firmly believe that retirement plan investors in the U.S. should be given the freedom to use a wide range of investment options to help them meet their goals. Investment choices and decisions should be left to qualified financial professionals and fiduciaries. They should not be determined or limited by politicians.
At Impax, we see ESG analysis as another tool to help investment managers to do a better job of evaluating the opportunities and risks arising from global sustainability challenges. By taking a broader spectrum of issues into account, those who apply ESG thinking to their work inherently have greater potential to outperform peers who do not.
Additionally, ESG thinking can help investment managers and their clients navigate any necessary investment limitations. For example, health care foundations may require their investment managers to avoid investing in the tobacco sector.
A striking example of ESG thinking is recognizing that the world economy is in transition as global sustainability challenges, including climate change, pollution, natural resource depletion and changing social norms, reshape capital markets.
Society’s response to these challenges, shaped by disruptive forces in technology, policy and consumer preferences, are creating business opportunities on the scale of the industrial revolution across all sectors of the global economy, including transportation, energy, health care, finance and agriculture.
Some of the risks accompanying this transition aren’t being accurately priced or efficiently managed by financial markets. For example, last year, the mega drought in the U.S. West, unprecedented flooding in Australia and record heatwaves in Europe resulted in vast economic losses that have raised the specter of further withdrawal of privately provided property insurance from certain regions.
Meanwhile there is growing understanding of the long-term risk posed by destruction of natural habitats; it's estimated that $44 trillion in economic value generation — more than half of global GDP — depends significantly on nature.
Clearly, fiduciaries acting on behalf of investors need to understand these opportunities and risks, whether they label them ESG or not. For politicians to prohibit investment managers from analyzing ESG factors — for example, deliberately ignoring flood risk in a maritime state — strikes us as particularly shortsighted.
The case is compelling that ESG analysis can facilitate broader and longer-term perspectives, better enabling financial professionals to deliver on their fiduciary duty to provide competitive, risk-adjusted investment returns.
Moreover, investors who consider ESG issues should be better placed to engage with companies on their risk management, encouraging the consideration of issues that may otherwise be ignored.
Attempts to limit investment opportunities by politicizing investor choice is not a market-based approach and in our view would lead to lower financial returns over time. Restrictions on ESG analysis amount to a limit on investment freedoms — and an assault on common sense.
With the scale of challenges facing global society and businesses alike, investors need all the tools at their disposal to balance opportunities and risks in pursuit of their financial goals. The Biden Administration made the right call in protecting the interests of retirement plan investors.
Ian Simm is CEO of Impax Asset Management and Joe Keefe is its president.
IRAs now hold nearly twice the assets of 401(k) plans — and most of that money didn't arrive through annual contributions.
A new survey finds that many women prioritize financial security but continue to leave savings in accounts that may not keep pace with inflation.
Roundhill, Bitwise and GraniteShares funds remain on hold while the agency weighs how novel ETFs should be regulated.
"Shares of alternative assets managers have lagged this year as investors grow wary of private-credit exposure."
The fintech platform is touting a new AI-free Planning Observations feature, which draws on IRS tax records to uncover opportunities for advisors.
Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income
Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.
