Carve-outs, contingencies and exceptions

JUN 16, 2013
By  MFXFeeder
Are brokers winning the battle over a uniform fiduciary standard? Many SEC watchers believe they are, and they are troubled by it. Frankly, so are we. In a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission last month, nine industry organizations said they are concerned that the agency is moving toward a new fiduciary standard that accommodates the brokerage industry while purporting to provide clarity and protections to investors. The trigger for the letter was the SEC's request for information as it prepares a cost-benefit analysis for a uniform fiduciary standard — that is, one that would apply to anyone providing investment advice, be they a broker, adviser or financial planner. Comments for the analysis are due by July 5. These groups are concerned that certain assumptions in that request reflect the biases of the brokerage industry and would result in a new fiduciary standard that would be less clear-cut and rigorous than the one investment advisers already follow. That standard is simple and straightforward: Advisers should always act in the best interests of their clients. Surveys have shown that the vast majority of investors believe that this standard already exists under the law for anyone dispensing investment advice, no matter what their title. However — legally, at least — brokers are governed by a suitability standard that allows them to sell financial products that, while fitting the investor's overall profile, may not necessarily be in the client's best interests. Both advisers and brokers have the Dodd-Frank financial reform law on their side. Dodd-Frank gave the SEC authority to issue a uniform fiduciary standard. It also stipulated that the standard could not be any less stringent than the one investment advisers currently follow. On the other hand, Dodd-Frank also said that a uniform fiduciary standard could allow brokers to continue charging commissions and selling proprietary products. And it would not necessarily have to subject them to a continuing duty of care or loyalty to a retail client. In its 72-page request for information for its cost-benefit analysis, the SEC mentions these allowances and also talks about whether disclosing a conflict of interest to investors would be sufficient under a fiduciary standard (instead of insisting that advisers avoid these conflicts). This has led critics to postulate that the SEC might propose a rule-based fiduciary standard that has so many carve-outs, contingencies and exceptions that it is rendered almost useless — at least for investors. If the idea is to clear up confusion over what an investment adviser's or broker's responsibilities are, the SEC is on the wrong track, they argue.

NO DECISIONS MADE

The SEC insists that its critics shouldn't read too much into the request for information in connection with the cost-benefit analysis. Just because it includes certain scenarios in its request doesn't mean that it has made up its mind about what form the fiduciary standard will take. But the devil is always in the details, and these groups are rightly concerned. The process bears watching, especially if it looks like the SEC is more interested in figuring out ways to accommodate those providing advice instead of those receiving it. The fact is, the SEC may not be able to craft a fiduciary standard that makes everyone in the financial advice industry happy. In that case, it would be wise for the regulator to remember where its primary allegiance should lie — and that is with the investing public. We reiterate our long-standing recommendation on a fiduciary standard. There is no need to invent a new one. The existing standard followed by investment advisers — to always act in a client's best interests — should be extended to brokers so investors, once and for all, will have the protections they deserve and which many of them have always assumed they had.

Latest News

Maryland bars advisor over charging excessive fees to clients
Maryland bars advisor over charging excessive fees to clients

Blue Anchor Capital Management and Pickett also purchased “highly aggressive and volatile” securities, according to the order.

Wave of SEC appointments signals regulatory shift with implications for financial advisors
Wave of SEC appointments signals regulatory shift with implications for financial advisors

Reshuffle provides strong indication of where the regulator's priorities now lie.

US insurers want to take a larger slice of the retirement market through the RIA channel
US insurers want to take a larger slice of the retirement market through the RIA channel

Goldman Sachs Asset Management report reveals sharpened focus on annuities.

Why DA Davidson's wealth vice chairman still follows his dad's investment advice
Why DA Davidson's wealth vice chairman still follows his dad's investment advice

Ahead of Father's Day, InvestmentNews speaks with Andrew Crowell.

401(k) participants seek advice, but few turn to financial advisors
401(k) participants seek advice, but few turn to financial advisors

Cerulli research finds nearly two-thirds of active retirement plan participants are unadvised, opening a potential engagement opportunity.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today’s choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave