Credit-rating system needs overhaul

Many aspects of the U.S. financial system must be reformed in the wake of the financial crisis.
FEB 22, 2009
By  MFXFeeder
Many aspects of the U.S. financial system must be reformed in the wake of the financial crisis. So far, attention has been focused on improving securities regulation and the performance of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and increasing the Federal Reserve's role in regulating banks and quasi-banks. One area that has received little discussion is improving the performance of the credit-rating industry. Congress has yet to focus on what steps are needed. That is a serious oversight because the capital markets won't fully recover until the credibility of credit ratings has been repaired. Investors can be forgiven if they have little faith in the credit ratings issued by the major agencies. Those agencies contributed to the mortgage meltdown by giving triple-A ratings to mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations backed by large numbers of subprime mortgages. Many of those securities should have been rated below investment-grade. Their collapse in value wiped out investors, The Bear Stearns Cos. Inc. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., both of New York, and much of the capital of the commercial banks. The most recent failures of the ratings agencies come less than a decade after they failed to recognize the fraud at such companies as Enron Corp. and WorldCom Inc. We don't yet know whether Wall Street's mathematical wizards took advantage of flaws in the ratings firms' models, or if the agencies allowed their models to become obsolete, or whether the agencies provided the ratings the investment banks wanted so as to retain the banks' business. Perhaps all these factors played a part in the failure of the ratings agencies to rate the securities, now known as "toxic assets," properly. Naturally, there is great suspicion that the major agencies allowed their ratings to be colored by the fact that the issuers of the securities were paying for the ratings. If an issuer got an unwelcome rating from one agency, that agency might not get the business the next time. The ratings agencies, of course, deny that their ratings were affected in any way by the issuer pay business model, but given the recent failures, that must been greeted with skepticism. Other than the federal government's banning the issuer pay model for ratings agencies — an unlikely development — there are two ways that the credit-rating system could be improved. First, the market could discipline the major ratings agencies. One way for this to happen is for institutional investors to pay for ratings on any fixed-income securities that they plan to buy from the smaller investor-pay-based ratings agencies as a second opinion. This would provide competition for the major agencies, and any significant discrepancy between the ratings of the major agencies and the small investor-pay-based agencies would be quickly highlighted and would again raise questions about the objectivity of the majors. The second way would be for the SEC to monitor more closely the ratings agencies, to audit their ratings frequently and to recognize more of the investor pay agencies as Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations. The first way would clearly be more effective and could be implemented quickly, but institutions too often have proven reluctant to pay for ratings. That is why the issuer pay agencies have come to dominate the ratings business. So it may well fall to the SEC to monitor and discipline the ratings agencies.

Latest News

The 2025 InvestmentNews Awards Excellence Awardees revealed
The 2025 InvestmentNews Awards Excellence Awardees revealed

From outstanding individuals to innovative organizations, find out who made the final shortlist for top honors at the IN awards, now in its second year.

Top RIA Cresset warns of 'inevitable' recession amid tariff uncertainty
Top RIA Cresset warns of 'inevitable' recession amid tariff uncertainty

Cresset's Susie Cranston is expecting an economic recession, but says her $65 billion RIA sees "great opportunity" to keep investing in a down market.

Edward Jones joins the crowd to sell more alternative investments
Edward Jones joins the crowd to sell more alternative investments

“There’s a big pull to alternative investments right now because of volatility of the stock market,” Kevin Gannon, CEO of Robert A. Stanger & Co., said.

Record RIA M&A activity marks strong start to 2025
Record RIA M&A activity marks strong start to 2025

Sellers shift focus: It's not about succession anymore.

IB+ Data Hub offers strategic edge for U.S. wealth advisors and RIAs advising business clients
IB+ Data Hub offers strategic edge for U.S. wealth advisors and RIAs advising business clients

Platform being adopted by independent-minded advisors who see insurance as a core pillar of their business.

SPONSORED Compliance in real time: Technology's expanding role in RIA oversight

RIAs face rising regulatory pressure in 2025. Forward-looking firms are responding with embedded technology, not more paperwork.

SPONSORED Advisory firms confront crossroads amid historic wealth transfer

As inheritances are set to reshape client portfolios and next-gen heirs demand digital-first experiences, firms are retooling their wealth tech stacks and succession models in real time.