It is time for clarity in 401(k) fees

MAY 29, 2007
By  ewilliams
The law doesn’t require 401(k) plans to disclose their fees to investors in any comprehensive way. Is it any wonder, then, that 80% of investors aren’t aware of the fees they are being charged in their 401(k) plan? That level of ignorance, which was revealed in a study last year by the Government Accountability Office, is unacceptable. Unfortunately, it also is understandable, given the opacity of most 401(k) plans in the area of fees. That is why retirement plan fee disclosure should be a top priority for legislators. The Department of Labor is taking steps in the right direction by studying the administrative and investment-related fee and expense information that should be considered by participants when investing their retirement savings. The Labor Department is using the study to determine the manner in which the data should be furnished to plan participants and who should provide that information. Others also are working on improving the transparency of fee and expense information for plan participants and fiduciaries. ‘Concept paper’ The Securities and Exchange Commission, for example, said that it is inviting industry experts to participate in round-table discussions about 401(k) fee disclosure. The commission plans to provide a “concept paper” on the issue once the panel discussions are concluded. Let’s hope that all these discussions lead to legislation that actually serves investors. Our nation’s financial well-being rides on the outcome. About 50 million Americans invest in 401(k) plans, and most of them have no other kind of employer-paid retirement benefit. As 401(k) plans have grown in popularity over the past few years, traditional defined benefit pensions that guarantee a monthly benefit have just about disappeared. That is why it is imperative for the government to create the proper framework to protect American workers who rely on 401(k) nest eggs — and require easy-to-understand fee disclosure. In retirement plans, nickels and dimes matter. To that point, a recent Labor Department report illustrates how a $25,000 investment earning 7% annually grows to $227,000 over 35 years — if annual fees are 0.5%. But if annual fees were 1.5% instead, that same investment would grow to just $163,000 over the same period. The bottom line is that the average investor should be fully aware of the fees they are paying in their 401(k) plan. Elizabeth Krentzman agrees. She is a former general counsel of the Investment Company Institute in Washington and now a partner at Deloitte & Touche USA LLP in New York. She favors disclosure that provides clear and concise information. “Why can’t we have a simpli-fied disclosure for all [retirement] products that includes the fees and performance?” Ms. Krentzman said in a recent interview with InvestmentNews reporter Lisa Shidler. Why not, indeed.

Latest News

SEC charges Chicago-based investment adviser with overbilling clients more than $2.5M in fees
SEC charges Chicago-based investment adviser with overbilling clients more than $2.5M in fees

Eliseo Prisno, a former Merrill advisor, allegedly collected unapproved fees from Filipino clients by secretly accessing their accounts at two separate brokerages.

Apella Wealth comes to Washington with Independence Wealth Advisors
Apella Wealth comes to Washington with Independence Wealth Advisors

The Harford, Connecticut-based RIA is expanding into a new market in the mid-Atlantic region while crossing another billion-dollar milestone.

Citi's Sieg sees rich clients pivoting from US to UK
Citi's Sieg sees rich clients pivoting from US to UK

The Wall Street giant's global wealth head says affluent clients are shifting away from America amid growing fallout from President Donald Trump's hardline politics.

US employment report reactions: Overall better than expected, but concerns with underlying data
US employment report reactions: Overall better than expected, but concerns with underlying data

Chief economists, advisors, and chief investment officers share their reactions to the June US employment report.

Creative Planning's Peter Mallouk slams 'offensive' congressional stock trading
Creative Planning's Peter Mallouk slams 'offensive' congressional stock trading

"This shouldn’t be hard to ban, but neither party will do it. So offensive to the people they serve," RIA titan Peter Mallouk said in a post that referenced Nancy Pelosi's reported stock gains.

SPONSORED How advisors can build for high-net-worth complexity

Orion's Tom Wilson on delivering coordinated, high-touch service in a world where returns alone no longer set you apart.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.