Recruiting Wars 2010: Playing to win or just not to lose?

A hypothesis about the psychology behind the big deals
DEC 09, 2009
By  Bloomberg
Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney are reportedly offering over 300% to top producers. This reminds me of a business school exercise reportedly originally presented by a Harvard University Professor: The auctioneer holds up a $20 bill to be bid on. There are three rules. First, just like any auction, the highest bid wins. Second, unlike most auctions, the second highest bid also has to pay their amount and gets nothing. Third, the participants are not allowed to talk to each other as they bid in $1 increments. So, the first bidder generally will bid about $1. The second bidder sees a bargain and bids $2. This continues for awhile but gets more interesting when the bids get closer to $20. At some point, the bidders realize the trap they are in because their supposed bargain is about to get expensive. The top bid quickly gets to $20 and the next bidder has a tough choice; that is, pay $21 for a $20 bill or pay $19 and get nothing. The audience gets a big laugh when the bid hits $21. The seller of the $20 bill now stands to earn $21 ($20 + $21, minus the original $20). Because the losing bidder is losing so much more than the winner, you can easily see the bidding go past $30, and occasionally north of $100 for the mere $20 bill. The participants are no longer bidding to win, but only not to lose. Try it at home sometime….. Alright, so the deals are supposed to make up for deferred compensation, retention packages, the hassle of moving a book, the risk of moving a business, the risk that the firm might go out of business, the risk that the firm might get bought out, a year's worth of Starbucks, braces for the children, and maybe a big screen TV or two. And I know that it is very difficult to get the entire 300%, unless the Advisor grows his or her business dramatically over the length of the contract. And yes, this is the headhunter making fun of the whole process. And yes, I have always thought that firms would never give deals that they knew would lose money. But then I learned about the psychology of the Harvard University exercise. What a wonderful world.

Latest News

Maryland bars advisor over charging excessive fees to clients
Maryland bars advisor over charging excessive fees to clients

Blue Anchor Capital Management and Pickett also purchased “highly aggressive and volatile” securities, according to the order.

Wave of SEC appointments signals regulatory shift with implications for financial advisors
Wave of SEC appointments signals regulatory shift with implications for financial advisors

Reshuffle provides strong indication of where the regulator's priorities now lie.

US insurers want to take a larger slice of the retirement market through the RIA channel
US insurers want to take a larger slice of the retirement market through the RIA channel

Goldman Sachs Asset Management report reveals sharpened focus on annuities.

Why DA Davidson's wealth vice chairman still follows his dad's investment advice
Why DA Davidson's wealth vice chairman still follows his dad's investment advice

Ahead of Father's Day, InvestmentNews speaks with Andrew Crowell.

401(k) participants seek advice, but few turn to financial advisors
401(k) participants seek advice, but few turn to financial advisors

Cerulli research finds nearly two-thirds of active retirement plan participants are unadvised, opening a potential engagement opportunity.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today’s choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave