SEC must tread carefully with 12(b)-1s

JUL 16, 2007
By  ewilliams
As the Securities and Exchange Commission considers what changes, if any, should be made to the rule allowing 12(b)-1 fees, it should keep in mind medicine’s golden rule: First, do no harm. The SEC should be careful that any change it makes does no harm to investors. But it also should minimize any harm to financial services professionals who sell mutual funds to investors. Any rule change should recognize that many investors rely on brokers and investment advisers for guidance as to which mutual funds to buy and for follow-up service. The brokers and advisers, on the other hand, often rely on 12(b)-1 fees for a significant part of their income and the income of the firms that employ them. Flat abolition of 12(b)-1 fees, with no obvious avenue for firms and their advisers or brokers to replace the income, could drive many out of the business, leaving many smaller investors without guidance or assistance. Investors who should be using mutual funds to gain the protection of diversification might either try to invest in stocks or decide not to invest at all, because it seems too complicated. They might instead put the money into low-yielding bank accounts or certificates of deposit. Or the loss of a revenue stream might even encourage less scrupulous brokers or advisers to push investors toward individual stocks when such investments aren’t appropriate — or other investment products that pay nice fees. Despite these concerns, however, changes are needed to 12(b)-1 fees, which provide an estimated $11 billion a year in revenue to brokerage and investment advisory firms. That is $11 billion coming out of the pockets of mutual fund investors, often without their knowledge, and that is an $11-billion-a-year reduction in investment returns. Far too often, brokers and advisers fail to disclose clearly the existence of the 12(b)-1 fee. Far too often, they fail to earn the fee by continuing to service the clients after the sale. The simplest change for the SEC to make is to require brokers and advisers to provide to each investor a statement outlining, individually and in total, the fees and expenses attached to each fund in which the client is considering investing. This statement should also have an example of how the fees and expenses might affect the investment returns over one and five years. Failure to provide this disclosure should be a serious offense. Alternatively, the SEC could abolish 12(b)-1 fees but provide another mechanism for advisers and brokers to be paid by fund companies for any continuing services they provide to investors. Ideally, they would be required to provide evidence of that service before the fee was paid. The 12(b)-1 fee, instituted to help mutual funds through a difficult period, has outlived its original purpose. Now it serves a purpose not originally intended. A review of its utility and justification is well overdue. But the SEC must tread carefully. The unintended consequences of the abolition of 12(b)-1 fees could be worse for investors than their continuation if some other provision isn’t made for paying brokers and financial advisers.

Latest News

Most retirees are now carrying credit card debt
Most retirees are now carrying credit card debt

Over half of people retiree sooner than expected, and rising costs due to inflation, along with unexpected expenses, are leading a growing proportion of retirees to turn to credit cards, EBRI found.

Corient, formerly CI Private Wealth, targets 2026 for IPO
Corient, formerly CI Private Wealth, targets 2026 for IPO

During the third quarter, Corient completed the acquisitions of two firms.

Trump's second term poses fresh risk to ESG investing
Trump's second term poses fresh risk to ESG investing

The president-elect's policies, mirroring the playbook he used eight years ago, creates challenges for the already declining space

Not all advisors on bitcoin bandwagon, despite record returns
Not all advisors on bitcoin bandwagon, despite record returns

Bitcoin may be hitting all-time highs, but that's not fazing some advisors who still view the cryptocurrency with skepticism.

Raymond James nabs more Edward Jones advisors in Washington
Raymond James nabs more Edward Jones advisors in Washington

The wealth management giant has bolstered its independent advisor arm again with the latest additions in the Pacific Northwest.

SPONSORED Out with the old and in with the new: a 50% private markets portfolio

A great man died recently, but this did not make headlines. In fact, it barely even made the news. Maybe it’s because many have already mourned the departure of his greatest legacy: the 60/40 portfolio.

SPONSORED Destiny Wealth Partners: RIA Team of the Year shares keys to success

Discover the award-winning strategies behind Destiny Wealth Partners' client-centric approach.