DOL fiduciary rule opponents, lawmakers call for further delay at House hearing

Opponents cite new evidence of harm to small account holders
MAY 18, 2017

Republican lawmakers and opponents of the Labor Department's fiduciary rule on Thursday called for an extended delay of its implementation deadline, citing what some call new evidence of its harm to investors. Most witnesses before the House Education and Workforce Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions said that the regulation, whose applicability date has already been pushed back to June 9 from April 10, should be suspended further while the department conducts a review directed by President Donald J. Trump that could lead to its modification or repeal. "The new empirical evidence based on actual experience shows that the academic predictions dismissing the rule's harmful effects, such as reduced access to advice and assistance, were wrong," Bradford Campbell, a partner at Drinker Biddle & Reath and a hearing witness told lawmakers. "The fiduciary rule should be delayed until a complete review of this new, compelling evidence is complete." Mr. Campbell cited an Investment Company Institute survey of its fund-firm members that showed that financial advisers are abandoning smaller accounts. But Micah Hauptman, financial services counsel at the Consumer Federation of America, questioned the ICI's results. "ICI as well as other industry opponents provide claims about what the rule is doing with no factual basis to support those claims," said Mr. Hauptman, The DOL has been silent about extending the delay. The chairman of the House subcommittee, Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Mich., said he met with Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta one-and-a-half weeks ago. "This is firmly on their radar. They've considered it," Mr. Walberg said in an interview after the hearing. "There was no indication of a time certain. There's no indication to me that they were going to delay it beyond [June 9]. But I'm hopeful that the fact that they've done significant work [will mean] that we will get a delay." It could be getting late for the agency to act, if it intends to go through a rulemaking process for the extension that includes a notice and comment period. Mr. Campbell said in an interview afterwards that the DOL does not have to go through a new rulemaking. "They could justify an interim final rule based on the new information that has come to light" about the potential for the rule to make advice too expensive for investors with modest assets, said Mr. Campbell, the head of the DOL Employee Benefits Security Administration during the George W. Bush administration. A top industry lobbyist, Kent Mason, a partner at Davis & Harman, also was confident. "They could go straight to a final delay," Mr. Mason said after the hearing. "There is no legal question." Supporters of the rule, which requires financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients in retirement accounts, said that they will fight back if they feel the agency is cutting corners. "If the DOL delays the rule further, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, they should expect to get sued," said Mr. Hauptman. The reason opponents are pushing so hard to add to the delay is because the DOL has said that as of June 9, two provisions will go into effect. One expands the definition of who is a fiduciary to retirement plans and another sets impartial conduct standards. They say that the entire rule should be put on hold during the review, which the agency said will take until the end of the year. In his testimony, Jason Furman, former director of the Obama administration's Council of Economic Advisers, said that the rule is protecting small investors from conflicted advice that erodes their savings. "The costs [of the rule] are largely borne by parts of the financial industry that were benefitting at the expense of middle class households and [the] benefits go to middle-class households," Mr. Furman said.

Latest News

JPMorgan tells fintech firms to start paying for customer data
JPMorgan tells fintech firms to start paying for customer data

The move to charge data aggregators fees totaling hundreds of millions of dollars threatens to upend business models across the industry.

FINRA snapshot shows concentration in largest firms, coastal states
FINRA snapshot shows concentration in largest firms, coastal states

The latest snapshot report reveals large firms overwhelmingly account for branches and registrants as trend of net exits from FINRA continues.

Why advisors to divorcing couples shouldn't bet on who'll stay
Why advisors to divorcing couples shouldn't bet on who'll stay

Siding with the primary contact in a marriage might make sense at first, but having both parties' interests at heart could open a better way forward.

SEC spanks closed Osaic RIA for conflicts, over-charging clients on alternatives
SEC spanks closed Osaic RIA for conflicts, over-charging clients on alternatives

With more than $13 billion in assets, American Portfolios Advisors closed last October.

William Blair taps former Raymond James executive to lead investment management business
William Blair taps former Raymond James executive to lead investment management business

Robert D. Kendall brings decades of experience, including roles at DWS Americas and a former investment unit within Morgan Stanley, as he steps into a global leadership position.

SPONSORED How advisors can build for high-net-worth complexity

Orion's Tom Wilson on delivering coordinated, high-touch service in a world where returns alone no longer set you apart.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.