Finra arbitration panel hits Robert W. Baird & Co. with $17.8 million penalty

The asset and wealth management firm was accused of unfair competition and solicitation.
MAY 11, 2015
A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. arbitration panel has slapped Robert W. Baird & Co. and 20 of its employees with a fine of $17.8 million plus interest, awarded to Gleacher & Co., a dissolved investment firm, for alleged unfair competition and solicitation, among other claims related to employees who left Gleacher for Baird. Five of the 20 Baird employees have been ordered to pay at least $50,000 plus interest, and the firm has been ordered to pay $13 million in compensatory damages and nearly $4.6 million in attorney and consulting fees. The asset and wealth management firm, which also has investment banking and private equity divisions, denied the allegations. "While we disagree with this finding and are extremely disappointed in the outcome, we are fully reserved for this claim, and it will have no impact on our financial results," said John Rumpf, a Baird spokesperson. Gleacher did not respond to a request for comment. The company, which dissolved in 2014, is now solely "winding up its business and paying or providing for its obligations," its website said. In regards to the penalized Baird employees, Mr. Rumpf said that "these associates are important additions to our overall fixed income capital markets platform. “They've broadened our capabilities for our clients and have significant opportunities going forward," he said. Unfair competition is something that industry executives argue about all of the time, said Bill Singer, an attorney who specializes in the financial services industry. An age-old problem on Wall Street is the question of who owns the client: Does a client belong to the stockbroker or the company? Firms will sometimes argue that an employee who leaves is stealing clients. The regulator's decision may vary on a case-by-case basis, though. "You can take the exact same set of facts and some panels will say the former firm is right and other panels will say the current firm is right," Mr. Singer said. "It's important when you leave a brokerage firm that you do so in a proper manner so you don't get sued."

Latest News

Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice
Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice

A $141M judgment and a federal asset freeze collide over one shrinking pool

Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave
Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave

The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.

Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds
Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds

Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.

Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits
Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits

CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.

BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom
BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom

The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.