A 230 page proposal, which Finra has submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission for review, would allow the use of predicted returns in marketing and would apply to brokers dealing with institutions and investors possessing assets over $5 million.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. believes that "A member’s views regarding the projected performance of an investment strategy or single security may be useful," according to its proposal documentation.
However, this proposal has raised concerns among investor protection advocates. Stephen Hall, legal director of Better Markets, told the Financial Times that "Using projections is one of the easiest ways to mislead people. It’s easy for people to think the result is guaranteed. [Finra] are really opening a can of worms."
The proposal will undergo a public comment period before the SEC decides on its approval, a process that may extend beyond eight months. If approved, the change would significantly impact the marketing of private funds, a sector known for higher fees and growing investor interest due to potentially higher returns compared to public markets.
Lance Dial, a partner at K&L Gates law firm, told the FT, "This is a big change. It is good for fund managers who want to use this [information] in marketing through brokers."
Finra's 210-page filing notes that the rule change aims to align broker regulations more closely with those for fund managers and registered investment advisers, who are currently permitted to use projections in some marketing materials for sophisticated investors.
However, the proposal has stirred debate over the differing responsibilities of brokers and investment advisers. While advisers have a fiduciary duty to prioritize client interests constantly, brokers are only required to recommend products in the client's best interest without ongoing responsibilities.
The SEC has traditionally been strict about preventing money managers from making future promises to the general public. This stance was evident in September, when the SEC fined nine asset managers for displaying hypothetical results accessible to the general public, totaling $850,000. The nine companies were Banorte Asset Management, BTS Asset Management, Elm Partners Management, Hansen and Associates Financial Group, Linden Thomas Advisory Services, Macroclimate, McElhenny Sheffield Capital Management, MRA Advisory Group and Trowbridge Capital Partners.
Finra's proposal does include safeguards for investors, requiring brokers to have a sound basis for their estimates and ensuring investors can independently analyze the information or possess the necessary financial expertise. Yet, critics like Hall remain skeptical, fearing that even sophisticated investors could be misled, describing the proposal as "ill-considered and could open the door to lots of mischief."
The SEC, Finra, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, the brokers' industry lobby group, have declined to comment on the proposal.
Inside the Finra proposal:
Survey finds vacation confidence at an all-time high, defying budgetary constraints and ongoing inflation in travel costs.
A New Jersey appellate court reinstates regulators' ability to seek both restitution and disgorgement in a securities fraud case involving unregistered investments and diverted investor funds.
A federal appeals court has sided with activist investors in a closely watched proxy battle involving nine Puerto Rico municipal bond funds.
Judge rejects shareholder lawsuit targeting Fidelity's preferred stock deal.
The newest advisor-focused AI notetaker arrives with a low-price pitch for enterprises – but is it too little, too late to gain market share?
How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave
From direct lending to asset-based finance to commercial real estate debt.