Subscribe

Oppenheimer loses another arbitration case over alleged Ponzi scheme

Oppenheimer Ponzi scheme

The $1.5 million award to two investors follows a $36.7 million loss for Oppenheimer last September in a dispute involving the Horizon Private Equity III fund.

Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. last week lost another Finra arbitration case involving an alleged Ponzi scheme run by a former broker.

A unanimous three-person Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. arbitration panel ordered Oppenheimer to pay $1,483,670 in compensatory damages to two investors, Bruce Cullen Sr. and Rosemarie Cullen, according to the March 2 award.

In their arbitration claim filed in November 2021, the Cullens said their cause of action against Oppenheimer involved investments in the private equity fund Horizon Private Equity III.

The fund was also at the heart of Oppenheimer’s $36.7 million Finra arbitration loss last September involving eight other investors. The fund was run by a former Oppenheimer broker, John J. Woods.

In August 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed charges against Woods, alleging that he operated a $110 million Ponzi scheme tied to Horizon. The SEC said Horizon raised capital from more than 400 investors in 20 states.

“Horizon did not earn any significant profits from legitimate investments, and a very large percentage of purported ‘returns’ to earlier investors were simply paid out of new investor money,” the agency said in an Aug. 25, 2021, statement.  

The Cullens claimed that Oppenheimer violated Finra supervision rules as well as California law. The firm denied the allegations, according to the award document. The Cullens sought $2.5 million in compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, attorneys’ fees and other damages.

The arbitrators dismissed motions by Oppenheimer to dismiss the case and to postpone the hearing.

A lawyer for the Cullens declined to comment. Oppenheimer also declined to comment.

Woods, who is no longer registered as a broker, had 43 regulatory disclosures over 27 years in the industry working for three different firms, according to his BrokerCheck record.

Higher yields and the case for CEFs, BDCs and interval funds

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print