Proxy case could haunt SEC, Labor fiduciary rules

Opponents of expanding the fiduciary duty for investment advice have another weapon in their arsenal, following a court decision that chided the SEC for adopting an unrelated rule without conducting a proper cost benefit analysis
AUG 21, 2011
Opponents of expanding the fiduciary duty for investment advice have another weapon in their arsenal, following a court decision that chided the SEC for adopting an unrelated rule without conducting a proper cost benefit analysis. On July 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated a Securities and Exchange Commission rule that would have made it easier for shareholders to nominate company directors. Although the proxy access rule is unrelated to fiduciary duty, the court opinion echoed the case that fiduciary critics are making.

'ARBITRARILY, CAPRICIOUSLY'

“We agree with the petitioners and hold the [SEC] acted arbitrarily and capriciously for having failed once again ... adequately to assess the economic effects of a new rule,” the court opinion stated. The court held that the SEC fell short in quantifying certain costs — or explaining why they couldn't be quantified — and didn't support the predicted benefits. That court ruling could be used against the SEC and the Labor Department as they work to develop and expand the fiduciary standard for those giving investment advice. The two Republican commission members dissented from an SEC staff study that recommended applying the fiduciary standard to anyone who gives investment advice. That standard, which requires that financial advisers work in their clients' best interest, is more rigorous than the standard followed now by brokers, who must make sure only that the investments they recommend are “suitable” for their clients. The two commissioners objected to the study for failing to provide a sufficient economic justification for its conclusion, the same grounds on which the court tossed out the SEC's proxy access rule The SEC plans to go ahead and issue a fiduciary rule this fall, but the recent court ruling should give the commission pause, according to observers. “The D.C. Circuit case is sending them a clear warning that they need to do serious economic analysis of their rules before issuing them,” said James Angel, associate professor of finance at Georgetown University. An advocate for widespread adoption of the fiduciary standard maintains that the proxy access case isn't a harbinger of what may come. The benefits of fiduciary duty in terms of increasing investor returns through unbiased advice are more concrete than the positive effects of proxy access, said Knut Rostad, president and founder of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard. “The facts and circumstances are materially different,” Mr. Rostad said. In their objection to the SEC fiduciary report, commission members Kathleen Casey and Troy Paredes may have been blazing a trail to the courtroom, figuratively speaking, should a final SEC rule fail to assuage critics' fears about expanding the fiduciary duty to brokers. “The dissent from Casey and Paredes was a pretty transparent effort to provide the basis for a legal challenge,” said Barbara Roper, director of consumer protection at the Consumer Federation of America, and a supporter of universal fiduciary duty. The SEC promises to augment a fiduciary rule proposal with a robust cost benefit analysis, though it claimed to have supported the proxy access rule with such an analysis. The Labor Department also has said that it will provide more economic analysis for a proposed rule to extend fiduciary duty to more retirement plan advisers. That regulation, which could be finalized by the end of the year, has drawn withering criticism from a wide range of financial industry organizations. “The recent appellate decision doesn't change our responsibilities or our commitment to promulgating a regulation that meets our obligations to retirees and the public generally,” said a Labor Department spokesman who asked not to be identified. There are no indications so far that either agency will be hauled into court over its fiduciary work. “We won't even start to look at whether we want to go the litigation route until we see the final rule,” said Alice Joe, senior director of the Center for Capital Markets at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “Litigation is not our preferred route,” she said. “In fact, it's our last resort.” The chamber was one of the plaintiffs in the proxy-access case. It challenged the rule under a 1996 law that requires the SEC to take into account whether a regulation promotes “efficiency, competition and capital formation.” The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors has been vociferous in urging the SEC to consider what it calls the potential deleterious effects of increased regulatory and liability costs on registered representatives. But it isn't yet considering going to court over the matter. “That's a very remote possibility,” said NAIFA's president, Terry Headley. “But we do have to keep all viable options on the table.” Even if the SEC isn't challenged on the cost benefit analysis surrounding fiduciary duty, constantly worrying about legal threats could undermine the commission's effectiveness, according to Ms. Roper. SEC media relations officials didn't respond to a request for comment. Email Mark Schoeff at [email protected]

Latest News

SEC charges Chicago-based investment adviser with overbilling clients more than $2.5M in fees
SEC charges Chicago-based investment adviser with overbilling clients more than $2.5M in fees

Eliseo Prisno, a former Merrill advisor, allegedly collected unapproved fees from Filipino clients by secretly accessing their accounts at two separate brokerages.

Apella Wealth comes to Washington with Independence Wealth Advisors
Apella Wealth comes to Washington with Independence Wealth Advisors

The Harford, Connecticut-based RIA is expanding into a new market in the mid-Atlantic region while crossing another billion-dollar milestone.

Citi's Sieg sees rich clients pivoting from US to UK
Citi's Sieg sees rich clients pivoting from US to UK

The Wall Street giant's global wealth head says affluent clients are shifting away from America amid growing fallout from President Donald Trump's hardline politics.

US employment report reactions: Overall better than expected, but concerns with underlying data
US employment report reactions: Overall better than expected, but concerns with underlying data

Chief economists, advisors, and chief investment officers share their reactions to the June US employment report.

Creative Planning's Peter Mallouk slams 'offensive' congressional stock trading
Creative Planning's Peter Mallouk slams 'offensive' congressional stock trading

"This shouldn’t be hard to ban, but neither party will do it. So offensive to the people they serve," RIA titan Peter Mallouk said in a post that referenced Nancy Pelosi's reported stock gains.

SPONSORED How advisors can build for high-net-worth complexity

Orion's Tom Wilson on delivering coordinated, high-touch service in a world where returns alone no longer set you apart.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.