SEC wins court battle against Revered Father Emmanuel Lemelson

SEC wins court battle against Revered Father Emmanuel Lemelson
Meta keywords: SEC, Emmanuel Lemelson, Spruce Peak Fund, securities law, Investment Advisers Act, administrative law, follow-on proceeding, antifraud, civil penalty, investment adviser, jury trial, res judicata, constitutional challenge
The controversial hedge fund manager fails to stop the SEC from moving forward with a potential industry ban, after a federal judge rejects constitutional claims.
MAY 29, 2025

Reverend Father Emmanuel Lemelson, who manages The Spruce Peak Fund, LP, has failed to block a follow-on enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission that could bar him from the securities industry.

On May 27, 2025, U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ruled against Lemelson’s constitutional challenge, dismissing all five of his claims and allowing the SEC to proceed with its administrative proceeding.

The SEC had previously sued Lemelson in 2018 in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, after a pharmaceutical company complained in 2014 about his public criticism. The agency accused him of market manipulation and other misconduct under federal antifraud provisions.

Although the SEC secured only limited success with a jury, the district court entered a final judgment enjoining Lemelson from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 for five years, and ordered him to pay a $160,000 civil penalty.

The SEC later initiated an in-house administrative proceeding to determine whether Lemelson should be barred from the investment industry, using the injunction as the legal basis under Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

In December 2024, Lemelson filed a lawsuit in the District of Columbia, arguing that the follow-on proceeding violated his constitutional rights. His five claims included denial of due process, violation of Article III judicial power, deprivation of a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment, unlawful removal protections for administrative law judges under Article II, and a res judicata challenge based on the prior federal court judgment.

Judge Sooknanan dismissed two claims (jury trial and res judicata) for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1), finding that Congress had directed such matters to the SEC’s administrative process and appellate review. The remaining three claims (due process, Article III, and Article II) were dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim.

The judge relied on binding precedent, including Blinder, Robinson & Co. v. SEC, and found that Lemelson’s challenge to the lack of a jury trial could be addressed later through appellate review. The court also rejected his claim that SEC administrative judges were unconstitutionally protected from removal, noting that Lemelson had not alleged any specific harm under Collins v. Yellen.

The ruling is final at the district court level and does not bar Lemelson from seeking appellate review

Related Topics:
Robinhood fined $45M for multiple violations of securities law Genworth to pay $219M to settle securities lawsuit related to long-term-care insurance

Latest News

Judge OKs more than $90 million in settlement money for GWG investors
Judge OKs more than $90 million in settlement money for GWG investors

Mayer Brown, GWG's law firm, agreed to pay $30 million to resolve conflict of interest claims.

Fintech bytes: Orion and eMoney add new planning, investment tools for RIAs
Fintech bytes: Orion and eMoney add new planning, investment tools for RIAs

Orion adds new model portfolios and SMAs under expanded JPMorgan tie-up, while eMoney boosts its planning software capabilities.

Retirement uncertainty cuts across generations: Transamerica
Retirement uncertainty cuts across generations: Transamerica

National survey of workers exposes widespread retirement planning challenges for Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, and Boomers.

Does a merger or acquisition make sense for your firm? Why now is the perfect time to secure your firm’s future
Does a merger or acquisition make sense for your firm? Why now is the perfect time to secure your firm’s future

While the choice for advisors to "die at their desks" might been wise once upon a time, higher acquisition multiples and innovations in deal structures have created more immediate M&A opportunities.

Raymond James continues recruitment run with UBS, Morgan Stanley teams
Raymond James continues recruitment run with UBS, Morgan Stanley teams

A father-son pair has joined the firm's independent arm in Utah, while a quartet of planning advisors strengthen its employee channel in Louisiana.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave