Senate rollback of Dodd-Frank faces challenge in House

Financial Services Chairman Hensarling makes it clear the House won't rubber-stamp the Senate's bill.
MAR 15, 2018
Not so fast. That was the message from House Republicans a day after the Senate passed sweeping legislation that many bankers consider their best chance in years of easing post-crisis financial rules. House Financial Services Chairman Jeb Hensarling, a Texas Republican who routinely vilifies the Dodd-Frank Act, convened a press briefing with two other lawmakers Thursday to make clear that the House won't rubber-stamp the Senate bill. In fact, Mr. Hensarling said he's received a pledge from House Speaker Paul Ryan that the Senate's Dodd-Frank rollback will sit on his desk until there's some sort of consultation between the two congressional chambers. "It is a little presumptuous or naïve that the House would not expect to enter into a negotiation with the Senate," Mr. Hensarling said. "Some seem to be under the impression that we are going to vote on their bill." The Senate's legislation, crafted by Banking Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, mostly provides relief for smaller banks by freeing them from a number of constraints imposed on lenders deemed to-big-to-fail. It has few handouts for Wall Street because including such provisions would have turned off moderate Democrats whose support was needed to get it through the Senate. In June, the House passed much more ambitious legislation sponsored by Mr. Hensarling dubbed the Financial Choice Act. It would do away with regulators' ability to wind down Wall Street banks should they run into trouble, reduce the frequency of bank stress tests and repeal the Volcker Rule ban on banks making speculative market bets with their own capital. Mr. Hensarling said Thursday that he has no intention of demanding that the Senate sign off on the Financial Choice Act. Instead, he said he wants the Senate to add to its legislation at least some of the 30 stand-alone bills that the House has passed on financial rules in recent months on a bipartisan basis. U.S. Representative French Hill, an Arkansas Republican who joined Mr. Hensarling at the press briefing, said he may push for negotiated legislation to include a provision that would put a single regulator in charge of the Volcker Rule instead of the five that now handle it. "That would be something I personally would advocate for," he said in a Thursday interview. Mr. Hensarling was coy about some of the changes he'd like to see made to the Senate legislation, saying at one point that there is "some language in their bill that we wish to negotiate." When a reporter asked what that was, he responded, "When we sit down with them we will be more than happy to let them know," referring to senators. If Mr. Hensarling drives a hard bargain on his surprise, and it repels the 16 Democrats who voted for Mr. Crapo's bill, it could be bad news for bankers. A great opportunity to win relief from Dodd-Frank might slip through their fingers.

Latest News

Cerity Partners enters Iowa with Gilbert & Cook deal
Cerity Partners enters Iowa with Gilbert & Cook deal

The acquisition of $2 billion Gilbert & Cook extends a buying spree for the ultra-high-net-worth firm that has already touched six states this year.

The financial industry has a saving problem
The financial industry has a saving problem

After years of encouraging sacrifice and delayed gratification, advisors have to do the next emotional lift: helping clients let go of a potentially harmful scarcity mindset.

Investment accounts fund nearly 7% of US household spending, JPMorgan finds
Investment accounts fund nearly 7% of US household spending, JPMorgan finds

A new JPMorganChase Institute report reveals how deeply stock market wealth now drives everyday American spending, especially for retirees.

New white paper challenges advisors to rethink solo aging planning
New white paper challenges advisors to rethink solo aging planning

A survey of 507 solo agers finds most lack confidence in their plans and that systems, not just individuals, need to change.

Most Americans need $5,094 a month to retire - and most won't get there
Most Americans need $5,094 a month to retire - and most won't get there

A new Schroders survey exposes a widening gap between what Americans expect in retirement and what they're actually on track to receive.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income