'Too big to fail' may boost brokers', banks' loan costs

Provisions in legislation aimed at “too-big-to-fail” financial firms will increase borrowing costs for large institutions — and will make it harder to get secured lending, according to financial industry officials.
DEC 06, 2009
Provisions in legislation aimed at “too-big-to-fail” financial firms will increase borrowing costs for large institutions — and will make it harder to get secured lending, according to financial industry officials. The Financial Stability Improvement Act, approved last Wednesday by a 31-27 vote by the House Financial Services Committee, includes provisions that could force secured creditors in large failing financial companies to take a 20% reduction, or “haircut,” in the value of their loans. A secured creditor of a failed bank that's bailed out by the U.S. government will get back only 80% of its capital. Past that, the lender is treated as an unsecured creditor. For brokerage firms and other large financial firms looking for capital, this could lead to problems. “If you're trying to borrow, it will increase the cost of borrowing or eliminate secured lending,” said Scott Talbott, senior vice president for government affairs at The Financial Services Roundtable, which represents banks, insurance companies, brokerage firms and other companies involved in finance.

Could affect bond underwriting

“It will increase the riskiness of the companies, which is the exact opposite direction we're trying to move,” Mr. Talbott said. Bond underwriting done by investment banks could be affected. “They would have less money to lend or it would be lent at less favorable rates,” he said. “That risk has to be accounted for.” The resolution process under the bill is “very ambiguous,” said Andrew DeSouza, spokesman for the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. “It gives little certainty to secured creditors,” which provide funding for broker-dealers in both debt and equity. “That uncertainty could raise the cost of financing a whole host of things, [including] raising money for their own firms,” Mr. DeSouza said. Under the bill, financial companies with assets of at least $50 billion and hedge funds with assets of more than $10 billion would have to pay into a $150 billion dissolution fund. Members of the Financial Services Committee, however, praised the bill. In a statement, the committee said the legislation “will put an end to "too-big-to-fail' financial firms, help prevent the failure of large institutions from becoming a systemwide crisis and ensure that taxpayers are never again left on the hook for Wall Street's reckless actions.” The Financial Stability Improvement Act is the ninth financial-reform proposal approved by the committee. The bills are expected to be considered together on the House floor this week. E-mail Sara Hansard at [email protected].

Latest News

Advisor moves: Wells Fargo Advisors pulls in $9.6b in fresh talent during first half of May
Advisor moves: Wells Fargo Advisors pulls in $9.6b in fresh talent during first half of May

Big-name defections from Morgan Stanley, UBS, and Merrill Lynch headline a busy two weeks of recruiting for the wirehouse.

Why uncertainty is making behavioral coaching more valuable than ever
Why uncertainty is making behavioral coaching more valuable than ever

Markets have always been unpredictable. What has changed is the amount of information investors are trying to process and the growing role advisors play in helping clients avoid emotional decisions

Florida investor hits real estate syndicator with fraud suit over $750K
Florida investor hits real estate syndicator with fraud suit over $750K

Six apartment deals, one "big account," and $2.7M in undocumented insider loans. Now the lawsuit lands

Chicago’s 'Mr. Finance' posed as advisor in loan scheme, according to Illinois regulators
Chicago’s 'Mr. Finance' posed as advisor in loan scheme, according to Illinois regulators

The Illinois order refers to Brandon Ellington’s investment program as a “Ponzi-like scheme.”

Bezos calls for zero income tax on bottom half of earners
Bezos calls for zero income tax on bottom half of earners

But the Amazon executive chair seems to want it both ways, arguing that taxing the ultra-wealthy won't help struggling Americans.

SPONSORED Beyond wealth management: Why the future of advice is becoming more human

As technical expertise becomes increasingly commoditized, advisors who can integrate strategy, relationships, and specialized expertise into a cohesive client experience will define the next era of wealth management

SPONSORED Durability over scale: What actually defines a great advisory firm

Growth may get the headlines, but in my experience, longevity is earned through structure, culture, and discipline