A federal lawsuit accuses Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade of fabricating trades in a client's brokerage account, then erasing them.
Jeff Huntington, a California-based options trader with over two decades of market experience, is alleging that three fictitious trades appeared in his account on or about April 15, 2024, showing as executed orders in a put option contract. According to the filing (Huntington v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. et al, Case No. 1:26-cv-02206, E.D.N.Y.), none of those trades produced a clearing record, a trade confirmation, a position change, or an account statement entry.
The so-called phantom trades surfaced in the FIX April 19, 2024 $210 Put option contract. They carried filled-execution status, meaning they looked like real, completed trades on screen. But nothing behind them matched up. The Options Clearing Corporation had no record. No confirmation was ever sent. Within a day, the entries disappeared from his account entirely. The complaint alleges they were later scrubbed from the firms' internal systems as well.
The filing alleges this was not a glitch. It claims the trades were fabricated records that never corresponded to any actual market transaction, and that their deletion is consistent with destruction of records in connection with a pending proceeding.
The allegations go further. The suit claims the phantom trades were part of a wider pattern of manipulative order-handling and quote-fading stretching from 2022 to April 2024. On one trading day alone, Huntington alleges his orders were cancelled and rerouted more than 40 times, with the displayed bid price collapsing while the same option was quoted at materially different prices on competing platforms. His orders were being sent through payment-for-order-flow arrangements to market makers including Citadel Securities and Susquehanna International Group.
The filing also flags what it describes as a failure to produce mandatory records. Multiple SEC and FINRA recordkeeping requirements, including those governing audit trail data and surveillance alerts, are referenced. According to the suit, none of the required records tied to the phantom trades have been turned over despite seven months of discovery demands in a parallel FINRA arbitration.
For wealth management professionals and advisors who rely on broker-dealer platforms to custody client assets, the case raises pointed questions about trade verification, execution quality, and the reliability of the systems underpinning everyday portfolio management.
Huntington is seeking compensatory damages of not less than $2 million, with total claimed damages believed to exceed $40 million, plus disgorgement of payment-for-order-flow revenue and punitive damages.
The matter remains in its earliest stages. No determination on the merits has been made, and the defendants have not yet responded.
Industry report shows that there are now fewer firms as consolidation intensifies.
The firms building now have a head start that will be very difficult to close. The ones waiting are accumulating a debt they may not be able to repay.
Global revenues hit record high in 2025 with sector growing at four times the rate of traditional financial institutions.
He swore the bots were real, the FDIC had it covered - the SEC says neither was true
One firm controls 30% of options volume – and just lost this one
As $84 trillion prepares to change hands, advisors who treat estate planning as peripheral are quietly building a sieve, not a book.
In volatile markets, the advisors who win aren't the ones with the best calls - they're the ones whose clients stay the course.
