A federal trade court struck down President Donald Trump’s latest attempt to impose broad global tariffs on Thursday, delivering another setback to a cornerstone of his trade agenda and injecting fresh uncertainty into markets and businesses navigating shifting US trade policy.
The US Court of International Trade ruled Thursday that Trump’s 10% blanket tariffs on imports were not authorized under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, the legal provision the administration relied on after the Supreme Court earlier invalidated a separate round of tariffs imposed under emergency powers laws.
Reuters reported that the court’s decision came in a 2-1 ruling in favor of small businesses that challenged the tariffs, arguing the administration had overstepped its authority in seeking to revive sweeping import duties after prior legal defeats.
The Wall Street Journal said the court determined the administration failed to meet the conditions required under the 1974 trade statute, which permits temporary tariffs only under limited circumstances tied to serious balance-of-payments issues or threats to the US dollar. Judges rejected the administration’s position that long-running trade deficits justified the measures.
Trump introduced the tariffs in February following a Supreme Court ruling that dismantled an earlier set of tariffs enacted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The replacement duties were initially set at 10%, with Trump later threatening to raise them to 15%.
The latest decision is expected to intensify legal and political scrutiny surrounding the administration’s trade strategy and could ultimately send the dispute back to the Supreme Court if the government pursues an appeal.
The tariffs had been scheduled to remain in effect through July under the temporary authority granted by the Trade Act.
The case is part of a broader wave of legal challenges targeting Trump-era tariff measures, as businesses, importers and state governments continue pursuing relief from trade-related costs and tariff liabilities.
Chicago-based Mesirow Fiduciary Solutions adds flexPATH's plan-level outsourced fiduciary book, boosting its retirement market reach to $164 billion.
Also, Raymond James's employee advisor channel adds breakaways from Wells Fargo and Stifel, while UBS welcomes an ex-Morgan Stanley duo in Indiana.
It promised guaranteed principal and 10% monthly returns. The SEC says it invested nothing.
Ten years after entering the fee-based annuity market, MassMutual Ascend says nearly half its lifetime sales came in the past two years alone – but barriers remain among fee-only advisors.
Amplify, WealthReach, Zeplyn and Zocks have unveiled partnerships aimed at automating portfolio management, content creation, account opening, and client communication.
Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains
Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income
