Virginia poised to ban mandatory arbitration clauses for state-registered advisers

Virginia poised to ban mandatory arbitration clauses for state-registered advisers
State regulator said limitation is 'contrary to fiduciary duty.'
SEP 09, 2019
Investment advisers registered in Virginia will soon not be able to force clients into arbitration to settle disputes. A new state rule will go into effect on Sept. 16 that bans mandatory arbitration clauses in client contracts, according to Ron Thomas, director of the Virginia Division of Securities and Retail Franchising. "It's totally contrary to the fiduciary duty of an investment adviser to take away a right someone has to pursue the forum of their choice if they have a disagreement with an investment adviser," Mr. Thomas said in an interview at the North American Securities Administrators Association annual conference in Austin, Tex. Mr. Thomas and NASAA officials say Virginia is the first state to ban mandatory arbitration for advisers. The issue of mandatory arbitration usually centers on brokers, who include such clauses in nearly every customer contract. But many advisers also use them. Broker arbitration is handled by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., while adviser clients usually use other arbitration systems. [Recommended video: What makes ETFs a great structure for innovation?] The Dodd-Frank financial reform law gave the Securities and Exchange Commission the authority to ban mandatory arbitration for brokers, but the agency has not acted. The Virginia rule emanated from adviser exams that state regulators conducted, according to Mr. Thomas. When they saw advisers using mandatory arbitration, they asked them to remove the clauses from client agreements. (More: Small advice firms show increase in cyber-related issues) "We never had anyone refuse to take it out of their contract, so I thought it was time to codify it in a rule," Mr. Thomas said. The rule was proposed in late June with a comment deadline of Aug. 9. Mr. Thomas said he didn't receive any adviser opposition during the rulemaking process and no one requested a hearing. He said he is not opposed to arbitration for dispute resolution, if that's the venue that a client selects. "If they want to do it, fine," Mr. Thomas said. "I could care less, if they have a choice."

Latest News

Names of more B-Ds that sold deals of bankrupt Inspired Healthcare surface
Names of more B-Ds that sold deals of bankrupt Inspired Healthcare surface

Broker-dealers that sold the defunct securities backed by Inspired Healthcare generated more than $100 million in fees and commissions.

MetLife poll finds high-value home sales are becoming tax-planning events
MetLife poll finds high-value home sales are becoming tax-planning events

A new MetLife survey finds real estate professionals are increasingly steering clients toward tax experts as rising property values leave more sellers facing significant capital gains.

Kestra adds Raymond James recruiter to expand advisor hiring push
Kestra adds Raymond James recruiter to expand advisor hiring push

The independent broker-dealer expands its business development bench with a new recruiter and an internal promotion in the West.

Cerity Partners names Will Peng chief innovation officer
Cerity Partners names Will Peng chief innovation officer

The leading ultra-high-net-worth RIA joins other large wealth firms, including Raymond James and LPL, in creating executive roles focused on artificial intelligence strategy

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.