Wachovia/Wells to appeal verdict in raiding case

The bad blood between St. Louis crosstown rivals Stifel Nicolaus & Co. Inc. and the former Wachovia Securities LLC continues.
FEB 17, 2012
The bad blood between St. Louis crosstown rivals Stifel Nicolaus & Co. Inc. and the former Wachovia Securities LLC continues. Wachovia (now Wells Fargo Advisors LLC) is vowing to appeal a raiding case it lost last month involving four legacy A.G. Edwards brokers in South Carolina who joined Stifel in June 2008. A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. arbitration panel ordered Wachovia to pay Stifel and the brokers $1.1 million in legal costs. And in a highly unusual action, the panel also chided Wachovia for misleading a federal court about video surveillance the firm claimed to have of the brokers, which was used in getting a restraining order against them. The case is one of several disputes that erupted between Stifel and Wachovia after Wachovia Securities (then in Richmond, Va.) bought A.G. Edwards & Sons Inc. in 2007 and relocated to St. Louis. Stifel has hired a number of former A.G. Edwards brokers. “We're obviously pleased,” said Joe Dougherty, an attorney at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, who represented Stifel and the brokers in the South Carolina case. The 33 days of arbitration hearings that spanned more than a year shows “how hard-fought this case was,” Mr. Dougherty added. “Wells Fargo Advisors is very disappointed by this decision,” Tony Mattera, a spokesman for the firm, said in a statement. “We believe the case was wrongly decided, and we intend to move to vacate the award.” The bad blood between Stifel and Wachovia erupted a month after the Wachovia/Edwards deal was announced in May 2007. After Stifel chief executive Ron Kruszewski sent a letter inviting every A.G. Edwards broker to join his firm, A.G. Edwards complained. Mr. Kruszewski blasted back at Robert Bagby, then A.G Edwards' chief executive, mocking him for taking a raise and millions more in guaranteed bonuses for himself, while A.G. Edwards employees were left up in the air.

SECRET SURVEILLANCE

The brokers in the South Carolina case, Frank “Buddy” Brand, Marvin “Sonny” Slaughter, Stephen Jones and George Stukes, were all former A.G. Edwards brokers in Florence, S.C. After they left, Wachovia Securities sought a temporary restraining order from the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, claiming that the men illegally conspired to take clients and staff while still working at Wachovia, and took confidential client documents belonging to the firm. The brokers were the largest producers in the office, generating approximately $2.9 million on $471 million in assets, according to Wachovia's suit. But the South Carolina brokers, like other legacy A.G. Edwards representatives who found themselves subject to similar lawsuits, said A.G. Edwards and Wachovia had ensured them that they were free to leave and contact clients. The brokers were not covered under a non-solicitation agreement. In July 2008, federal Judge Terry Wooten denied Wachovia's request to prevent the brokers from soliciting clients, but ordered them not to use or keep any documents taken from Wachovia, including basic customer contact information. The order stayed in effect pending the Finra arbitration hearing. In obtaining the court order, Wachovia claimed to have video surveillance of several of the brokers removing documents from the Wachovia branch and taking them to a new Stifel office in Florence. “We have them on tape taking the things beyond what they [claimed],” Wachovia attorney Kathryn Bedke, of Paduano & Weintraub LLP, said in a June 2008 hearing before Mr. Wooten. He didn't see the video at the hearing, but when he asked Ms. Bedke if she wanted to state for the record that her representations of the video were accurate, she did so. Last month's arbitration award ordered the parties to advise the court that the videotape “does not support the allegations” made by Wachovia. The arbitrators awarded the $1.1 million in legal costs under South Carolina's Frivolous Civil Proceedings Act. “For some reason, Wachovia took it upon themselves to hire a private investigator to have us surveilled,” Mr. Slaughter said. But the video only “showed me putting some boxes in my car [and Mr. Jones] carrying in some bottled water and a phone book” to the office, he said. The three-person arbitration panel also ordered Wachovia to pay the full $73,000 in hearing fees. E-mail Dan Jamieson at [email protected].

Latest News

Advisor moves: Raymond James lands $1.25B team as Merrill loses two
Advisor moves: Raymond James lands $1.25B team as Merrill loses two

Iowa's Greenwood Wealth Partners exits D.M. Kelly as UBS and Ameriprise win Merrill Lynch recruits in California and Florida

Never a losing day: CFTC alleges $950 million forex Ponzi scheme
Never a losing day: CFTC alleges $950 million forex Ponzi scheme

Less than 1% of pool funds went to actual trading, CFTC says

Fintech bytes: Northwestern Mutual picks Jump for enterprise AI
Fintech bytes: Northwestern Mutual picks Jump for enterprise AI

Plus, SEIA builds a governed data foundation for its in-house AI and Snappy Kraken debuts a read-only marketing coworker for advisors.

People moves: AllianceBernstein names Onur Erzan as next CEO
People moves: AllianceBernstein names Onur Erzan as next CEO

Broadridge, Wedbush and Alaris Acquisitions have also filled senior wealth management roles with hires from J.P. Morgan, Osaic and SageView.

SPONSORED In the Age of AI, Trust Becomes the Advisor's Greatest Asset

As AI makes financial information more accessible than ever, Lana Hock explains why human judgment, trust, and empathy remain the qualities clients value most in a financial advisor

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains