ASPPA: Employers need a break from required contributions

ASPPA is asking the government to give employers a break from rules that require many companies to contribute 3% to their employees’ 401(k) plans.
FEB 20, 2009
By  Bloomberg
The American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries is asking the government to give employers a break from rules that require many companies to contribute 3% to their employees’ 401(k) plans. Officials at the Arlington, Va.-based ASPPA wrote a letter to the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service asking that employers who are required to make a 3% contribution to their employees’ plans so they can get safe-harbor provisions be allowed to suspend the contribution because of economic hardship. Under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, employers who contributed 3% annually to employees’ 401(k) plans didn’t have to meet “non-discrimination” or “top-heavy” rules meant to prevent plans from favoring its higher earners. In the past, the IRS had limited the maximum deferral by highly compensated employees to make sure that lower-paid employees received at least a minimum benefit in plans where most of the assets were owned by higher-paid key employees. If companies failed to pass certain tests, they were required to return money to highly compensated workers. Now, employers who contribute the 3% to workers don’t have to take these tests. But the problem, according to ASPPA officials, is that many companies are struggling to contribute 3% to their 401(k) plans. Under existing regulations, employers who can’t afford to contribute to their plans have no other recourse than to terminate the retirement plans. The ASPPA is asking the government to allow employers to suspend their contributions though they would still have to show that the firm isn’t favoring highly compensated workers. “It's pretty bad, and a lot of employers are really considering it. Times are tough,” said Brian Graff, the ASPPA’s executive director and chief executive. “You're talking about a lot of employers who are freezing payroll, and 3% is a lot of money,” he said.

Latest News

Risk appetite fades, stocks snap seven-day winning streak
Risk appetite fades, stocks snap seven-day winning streak

Oil is also lower Thursday as investors take a breath.

No need for rate cuts now, says Fed’s Daly
No need for rate cuts now, says Fed’s Daly

Policymakers can afford to be patient says Fed San Francisco president.

Gold drops again as haven demand eases
Gold drops again as haven demand eases

More positive trade talks prompts bullion pullback.

Can Americans even afford RFK Jr.'s drive for healthier diets?
Can Americans even afford RFK Jr.'s drive for healthier diets?

Reduced reliance on ultra-high-processed food will be costly.

What should RIAs have on their regulatory radar right now?
What should RIAs have on their regulatory radar right now?

With a new regime at the SEC, Savvy Wealth's Lisandra Wilmott speaks out on ongoing and unfolding risks around off-channel communications, AI, and private market investments.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave

SPONSORED The evolution of private credit

From direct lending to asset-based finance to commercial real estate debt.