ASPPA: Employers need a break from required contributions

ASPPA is asking the government to give employers a break from rules that require many companies to contribute 3% to their employees’ 401(k) plans.
FEB 20, 2009
The American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries is asking the government to give employers a break from rules that require many companies to contribute 3% to their employees’ 401(k) plans. Officials at the Arlington, Va.-based ASPPA wrote a letter to the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service asking that employers who are required to make a 3% contribution to their employees’ plans so they can get safe-harbor provisions be allowed to suspend the contribution because of economic hardship. Under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, employers who contributed 3% annually to employees’ 401(k) plans didn’t have to meet “non-discrimination” or “top-heavy” rules meant to prevent plans from favoring its higher earners. In the past, the IRS had limited the maximum deferral by highly compensated employees to make sure that lower-paid employees received at least a minimum benefit in plans where most of the assets were owned by higher-paid key employees. If companies failed to pass certain tests, they were required to return money to highly compensated workers. Now, employers who contribute the 3% to workers don’t have to take these tests. But the problem, according to ASPPA officials, is that many companies are struggling to contribute 3% to their 401(k) plans. Under existing regulations, employers who can’t afford to contribute to their plans have no other recourse than to terminate the retirement plans. The ASPPA is asking the government to allow employers to suspend their contributions though they would still have to show that the firm isn’t favoring highly compensated workers. “It's pretty bad, and a lot of employers are really considering it. Times are tough,” said Brian Graff, the ASPPA’s executive director and chief executive. “You're talking about a lot of employers who are freezing payroll, and 3% is a lot of money,” he said.

Latest News

Advisor moves: Baird gains $508M RBC team as Merrill Lynch lands $560M in talent
Advisor moves: Baird gains $508M RBC team as Merrill Lynch lands $560M in talent

The latest father-son additions at Merill include a tandem originally with Wells Fargo and an Iowa-based trio that crossed over from Baird.

Investors sue Blue Owl advisor, allege inflated marks drove windfall fees
Investors sue Blue Owl advisor, allege inflated marks drove windfall fees

Investors say the advisor graded its own assets - then cashed in

Investors accuse Norada Capital of hiding note risks
Investors accuse Norada Capital of hiding note risks

Oregon investors allege Norada sold high-yield notes through a Ponzi scheme

Schwab enters prediction markets despite CEO's gambling warnings
Schwab enters prediction markets despite CEO's gambling warnings

Schwab founder Charles Schwab invested in Kalshi in 2021. Now the brokerage is launching binary options on predicting the S&P 500 through Cboe.

How AI has gone mainstream with ultra-high-net-worth investors
How AI has gone mainstream with ultra-high-net-worth investors

With more HNW clients coming to meetings armed with AI research, BNY Wealth report finds advisor expertise is more critical than ever as the final human check.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.