While defined contribution plans represent the next logical market for private equity funds to tap, that doesn't mean DC plan sponsors should be excited for the opportunity necessarily.
That's the upshot of a new report from the Morningstar Center for Retirement & Policy Studies, which unpacks the pros and cons of including private market funds in defined contribution plans.
While private equity has long been a key component of institutional portfolios, its introduction into defined-contribution plans like 401(k)s remains relatively new. The case for such alternative funds appears strong on paper, with managers boasting a history of material outperformance over the public markets. But recent headwinds – including increased borrowing costs from higher interest rates, a crunch in available capital, and an apparently strictiral decline in the number of PE funds relative to those seeking capital – have "made the environment less favorable," according to the report.
Based on 2020 guidance from the Department of Labor, the report said DC plans can include private equity investments without violating ERISA provisions if they live within diversified managed solutions, such as target-date funds, and it's otherwise walled off to participants.
"[T]he fund within which the illiquid investment resides must have a 'sufficient' level of liquidity—that is, investment in public-market vehicles to meet likely participant demands," the report said, emphasizing the DOL's advice is just guidance.
Even though private market fund exposure could help participants diversify their retirement portfolios more broadly into alternatives such as real estate, private credit, and farmland, the report emphasized "sponsors will likely be wary of constraints on liquidity unless the end investor is unambiguously aware of such constraints." To get around those challenges, the authors highlighted several structures have been developed including interval funds, which offer periodic redemption options, and tender offer funds, which allow redemptions at the discretion of the fund’s board.
Muddying the picture further, private equity valuations rely on on appraisal-based models. These valuations, while often less volatile than public market prices, may lack transparency and comparability, making it challenging to bolt private assets into DC plans alongside traditional options such as index funds.
"The market is at its launch point and such funds are likely to take hold slowly," the report read. "Making plan sponsors comfortable with the higher pricing, lower liquidity, and less-straightforward reporting will be a hurdle, but hardly insurmountable."
A 5-4 ruling preserves the Federal Reserve's independence for now, but the legal fight over presidential removal power is far from settled.
For years, large firms have been facing penalties and questions from regulators over interest rates for clients’ cash accounts.
Market volatility can be stressful, but it also represents opportunity for advisors and their clients.
After years of mixed signals and shifting timelines from Jamie Dimon, Wall Street sources suggest the race to lead JPMorgan Chase has entered its decisive stretch.
Advisors and broker-dealers adjusting to the March 2026 threshold change face bigger challenges around back-end monitoring than the new dollar limit itself.
Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income
Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.
