Countdown to retirement

Reviewing key deadlines with a group of friends at age 64
MAY 11, 2018

I celebrated a major milestone with a group of friends recently. We met as newly minted teenagers in 1968 when we were freshmen in high school. Today, with most of us on the cusp of retirement, we took a trip to Charleston to commemorate 50 years of friendship. For years, my girlfriends have listened to me prattle on about Social Security rules and strategies. But now that we are all 64, the information took on new urgency. They literally begged me to review their individual situations and options as they sat around the table with pens and pads in hand. Our trip was a perfect time for a pre-retirement review. As my friend and colleague Dr. Katy Votava, renowned Medicare expert and president of Goodcare.com, always says: "64 is a good age to read the meter." It amazes me how our small group of nine women represents a microcosm of aging baby boomers. Two are widows. The other seven are married — although not necessarily for the first time. They have hosted weddings and buried parents. Most are grandmothers. (One member of our group died two years ago, but we brought along an enlarged photo of her to include in all our group pictures.) First question: When should they enroll in Medicare?​ It depends. For those couples where at least one spouse is still working beyond age 65 and who has access to employer-provided group health insurance, they can both delay enrolling in Medicare penalty-free until that insurance coverage ends. Ditto for single individuals with access to group health insurance. Delaying Medicare enrollment beyond age 65 is particularly attractive to workers who contribute to a health savings account. Once they enroll in Medicare, they can no longer make tax-deductible contributions to an HSA, but they can continue to take tax-free withdrawals to pay for qualified medical expenses. However, when it comes to delayed Medicare enrollment, there is an exception for small business owners with fewer than 20 employees. Their company health insurance does not count as "creditable" insurance for Medicare purposes. If they fail to enroll in Medicare during their initial seven-month enrollment period that begins three months before their 65th birthday, they will face lifelong delayed enrollment penalties of 10% for every year they were eligible to enroll in Medicare Part B but did not. There is also a separate delayed enrollment penalty of 12% per year for Medicare Part D prescription drug plans. Plus, if they miss their initial enrollment period, they must wait until the next general enrollment period, which runs from January through March each year, to sign up for Medicare coverage that begins the following July. In the meantime, they could be on the hook for 80% of their medical bills even if they have other insurance. Ouch! Next question: When should they claim Social Security? As we were all born in 1954, we missed the cutoff that would enable us to claim only spousal benefits at age 66 and allow our own retirement benefits to continue to grow until age 70. But several of us are married to men who are a few years older and who can take advantage of this filing strategy once we claim Social Security. One of the "girls" couldn't wait to call her accountant husband and relay their optimum strategy: She would claim Social Security when she turns 65 next year and he could then claim spousal benefits the following month when he turns 66. She works part-time, so the Social Security earnings test would not affect her. Another of my friends was excited about the prospect that she and her new husband could execute the same combo claiming strategy. But there is a problem. He is a federal retiree with a public pension based on a job where he did not pay Social Security taxes. That means although he is old enough to file a restricted claim for spousal benefits on her earnings record, the Government Pension Offset rules would wipe out his benefits. Oh well. Both of the widows plan to claim survivor benefits when they turn 66 in 2020, even if they are still working, because survivor benefits are worth the maximum amount when claimed at full retirement age. The earnings restrictions disappear at the same time. In the meantime, their own Social Security retirement benefits will continue to grow by 8% per year up until age 70. At that point, they can switch to their larger retirement benefits and their survivor benefit would disappear. Armed with this knowledge about Social Security and Medicare rules and strategies, they all feel more confident as they inch closer to retirement. I hope your clients do, too.

Latest News

Mercer Advisors, Osaic deepen AI bets with Arch and Nitrogen deals
Mercer Advisors, Osaic deepen AI bets with Arch and Nitrogen deals

Arch claims 40% operating cost savings for Mercer as Nitrogen unlocks its agentic AI and tech suite to 10,000 Osaic advisors

LPL advisor, South Carolina state senator, elected to U.S. Congress
LPL advisor, South Carolina state senator, elected to U.S. Congress

A happy coincidence: one of LPL Financial’s corporate campuses happens to be based in Rep.-elect Wes Climer’s new district.

Advisor moves: JPMorgan lands $940M Merrill veteran in Los Angeles
Advisor moves: JPMorgan lands $940M Merrill veteran in Los Angeles

Wells Fargo and UBS also add advisors from Morgan Stanley, Edward Jones, Merrill and Fidelity in a fresh round of wirehouse recruiting

Wall Street products, Main Street regulators
Wall Street products, Main Street regulators

How we got here – and what to do about it

Most Americans are OK with AI managing their money - but not how you think
Most Americans are OK with AI managing their money - but not how you think

AI trust gap: Americans want protection, not autonomy, in their finances

SPONSORED Built on insurance experience to deliver on long-term promises

Knighthead Life entered the market with a competitive MYGA. A strong launch earned advisor confidence and paved the way for FIAs.

SPONSORED In the Age of AI, Trust Becomes the Advisor's Greatest Asset

As AI makes financial information more accessible than ever, Lana Hock explains why human judgment, trust, and empathy remain the qualities clients value most in a financial advisor