DOL is overreaching its authority again, fiduciary rule critics tell Texas federal court

DOL is overreaching its authority again, fiduciary rule critics tell Texas federal court
Representatives of life insurance and annuity issuers argue the labor department’s defense suffers the same weaknesses as its 2016 predecessor.
JUL 16, 2024

A coalition representing life insurance and annuity issuers told a federal court in Texas that the US Department of Labor's new fiduciary rule overreaches its authority and flouts previous court rulings.

In a filing submitted Friday, the coalition – which includes the American Council of Life Insurers, several chapters of the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors, the Insured Retirement Institute, the National Association for Fixed Annuities, and Finseca – argued that the DOL's new rule, unveiled in April, disregards a 2018 Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that vacated its previous 2016 rule.

The group initially launched its legal action against the DOL in May, roughly one month after the new fiduciary rule was approved and finalized.

"DOL devotes the bulk of its opposition attempting to defend the rule on the merits, barely contesting the other preliminary-injunction factors," the filing stated. "In doing so, DOL merely relitigates, rather than faithfully abides by, the Fifth Circuit’s 2018 decision to vacate its previous 2016 attempt at imposing a fiduciary standard."

That decision in the landmark legal challenge Chamber of Commerce v. U.S. Department of Labor established that ERISA codified the common law understanding of fiduciary relationships based on trust and confidence. The coalition argued that DOL’s new rule ignores this distinction, transforming insurance agents and brokers into fiduciaries without considering whether their relationships meet the common law definition.

"The rule seeks to transform virtually all insurance agents and brokers who recommend retirement products in compliance with existing state and federal laws into fiduciaries without regard to whether those relationships actually are or would be ‘fiduciary’ at common law," the filing asserted.

The coalition also contended that the rule turns a blind eye toward the Fifth Circuit’s differentiation between investment advisers, who are fiduciaries, and stockbrokers and insurance agents, who are not typically deemed fiduciaries in product sales.

"The rule does precisely what Chamber forbids: it ignores the core distinction between investment advice paid for by a client and sales speech engaged in by insurance agents, brokers, and others incidental to the sale of retirement products," the filing said.

In defending its new rule, the DOL pointed to ERISA's “expansive” standard, with a "functional" test that the labor department said grants it the authority to create fiduciary relationships even when the common law doesn’t necessarily do so.

However, the coalition pointed out that the Fifth Circuit has previously rejected this interpretation, emphasizing that ERISA’s definition of a fiduciary must align with the common law understanding.

"DOL’s efforts to revisit these claims are baseless," the coalition argues. "The Fifth Circuit decisively rejected that entire line of argument."

In its defense of the 2016 rule, and now the new rule, the DOL pointed to the Fifth Circuit’s determination that ERISA's reference to "advice for a fee" – a major hallmark of fiduciary relationships – could include commissions under certain conditions.

The coalition, however, highlighted that the new fiduciary rule omits two crucial elements of the five-part test defined under ERISA in 1975, which the Fifth Circuit deemed necessary for commissions to qualify as fiduciary compensation.

"The rule jettisons the ‘mutual agreement’ and ‘regular basis’ prongs of the five-part test, with the impermissible result that virtually any commissioned sale of a retirement product triggers fiduciary status," the coalition stated.

Latest News

Maryland bars advisor over charging excessive fees to clients
Maryland bars advisor over charging excessive fees to clients

Blue Anchor Capital Management and Pickett also purchased “highly aggressive and volatile” securities, according to the order.

Wave of SEC appointments signals regulatory shift with implications for financial advisors
Wave of SEC appointments signals regulatory shift with implications for financial advisors

Reshuffle provides strong indication of where the regulator's priorities now lie.

US insurers want to take a larger slice of the retirement market through the RIA channel
US insurers want to take a larger slice of the retirement market through the RIA channel

Goldman Sachs Asset Management report reveals sharpened focus on annuities.

Why DA Davidson's wealth vice chairman still follows his dad's investment advice
Why DA Davidson's wealth vice chairman still follows his dad's investment advice

Ahead of Father's Day, InvestmentNews speaks with Andrew Crowell.

401(k) participants seek advice, but few turn to financial advisors
401(k) participants seek advice, but few turn to financial advisors

Cerulli research finds nearly two-thirds of active retirement plan participants are unadvised, opening a potential engagement opportunity.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today’s choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave