Early filers cannot choose their Social Security benefits

Retirees can only restrict claims to spousal benefits if they wait until their full retirement age to file for benefits.
OCT 23, 2014
There must be something in the air. I have received a slew of questions from financial advisers lately asking if a client who files for Social Security benefits before full retirement age can collect only spousal benefits while allowing their own benefit to grow to the maximum amount up to 70. The short answer is no. If you prefer the official answer from the Social Security Handbook, here it is: “If you are eligible for both reduced retirement insurance benefits and reduced spouse's insurance benefits beginning with the same month, you cannot restrict an application to just one of these types of benefits. By filing for either benefit, you are deemed by law to have filed for both types of benefits.” That's why the strategy of filing a restricted claim for spousal benefits is so powerful. If you wait until your full retirement age to claim benefits, you can request that you receive spousal benefits only while your own retirement benefits continue to earn delayed retirement benefits worth 8% per year for every year you postpone collecting up until age 70. The result is your retirement benefit would be worth 132% of your full retirement age benefit at 70. But you can only restrict your claim to spousal benefits if you wait until your full retirement age to file for benefits. Here's an example of what happens to someone who is entitled to both retirement and spousal benefits who files before her full retirement age. Let's say the husband's full retirement age benefit, also known as his primary insurance amount, or PIA, is $2,400 per month. The maximum spousal benefit his wife can collect is $1,200 per month — 50% of the husband's PIA — if his wife claims benefits at her full retirement age. But if she claims benefits as the earliest age of 62, her spousal benefit would be worth just 35% of her husband's PIA — $840 per month. Let's also assume the wife's own retirement benefit at her full retirement age of 66 is $1,000 per month. The difference between the maximum spousal benefit of $1,200 per month and her retirement benefit of $1,000 is $200 per month. That's the spousal differential. If she claims benefits at 62, her own benefit will be reduced by 25% to $750 per month. That’s smaller than her spousal benefit of $840. So she will receive the higher amount of $840 per month but it will actually be comprised of $750 of her own benefit and topped off by $90 of her spousal benefit. Now let’s add a twist. Let’s assume the wife collects her own reduced retirement benefit of $750 per month at 62 but her husband has not yet filed for Social Security, so there is no spousal benefit to claim. And let’s also assume that when he does claim benefits, she is at least 66 years old. At that point, she will step up to a larger benefit, but it will be worth less than 50% of his PIA because she claimed her own benefits early. The math works like this: At 66, her new benefit will be worth $950 per month comprised of her $750 per month retirement benefits, topped off by the $200 spousal differential. Now let's imagine how she might maximize her Social Security benefits. If she waits until her full retirement age of 66 to claim benefits, she could file a restricted claim for spousal benefits, and collect $1,200 per month while her own benefits continue to grow. At 70, she could switch to her own retirement benefit, which would then be worth $1,320 per month. The amount would actually be higher as cost-of-living adjustments during the intervening four years would also be applied. So the bottom line is, if you claim benefits before your full retirement age, you must collect the highest benefit to which you are entitled, reduced for early claiming. You can't choose which benefit to claim. But for some married couples, that may be a sound strategy, boosting overall household income by allowing one spouse to collect a reduced benefit early and the other spouse to hold out for a bigger benefit later. The added bonus for married couples is the survivor benefit. When one spouse dies, the largest Social Security benefits continue and the smaller one disappears. Therefore, the main goal of most married couples should be to maximize the survivor benefit by having the higher-earning spouse delay collecting Social Security benefits as long as possible. (Questions about Social Security? Find the answers in my e-book.)

Latest News

Slow is smooth, smooth is fast
Slow is smooth, smooth is fast

Chasing productivity is one thing, but when you're cutting corners, missing details, and making mistakes, it's time to take a step back.

Edward Jones layoffs about to hit employees, home office staff
Edward Jones layoffs about to hit employees, home office staff

It is not clear how many employees will be affected, but none of the private partnership’s 20,000 financial advisors will see their jobs at risk.

CFP Board hails record July exam turnout with 3,214 test-takers
CFP Board hails record July exam turnout with 3,214 test-takers

The historic summer sitting saw a roughly two-thirds pass rate, with most CFP hopefuls falling in the under-40 age group.

Founder of water vending machine company, portfolio manager, charged in $275M Ponzi scheme
Founder of water vending machine company, portfolio manager, charged in $275M Ponzi scheme

"The greed and deception of this Ponzi scheme has resulted in the same way they have throughout history," said Daniel Brubaker, U.S. Postal Inspection Service inspector in charge.

Advisor moves: Raymond James, Wells Fargo reel in billion dollar-plus advisor teams
Advisor moves: Raymond James, Wells Fargo reel in billion dollar-plus advisor teams

Elsewhere, an advisor formerly with a Commonwealth affiliate firm is launching her own independent practice with an Osaic OSJ.

SPONSORED Delivering family office services critical to advisor success

Stan Gregor, Chairman & CEO of Summit Financial Holdings, explores how RIAs can meet growing demand for family office-style services among mass affluent clients through tax-first planning, technology, and collaboration—positioning firms for long-term success

SPONSORED Passing on more than wealth: why purpose should be part of every estate plan

Chris Vizzi, Co-Founder & Partner of South Coast Investment Advisors, LLC, shares how 2025 estate tax changes—$13.99M per person—offer more than tax savings. Learn how to pass on purpose, values, and vision to unite generations and give wealth lasting meaning