Funds, 401(k) service providers differ on fee breakdown

The mutual fund industry and independent 401(k) service providers squared off last week before the House Ways and Means Committee over whether fees for various 401(k) services should be broken down in disclosures to employers.
NOV 05, 2007
By  Bloomberg
The mutual fund industry and independent 401(k) service providers squared off last week before the House Ways and Means Committee over whether fees for various 401(k) services should be broken down in disclosures to employers. "Resist calls to dictate one business model for 401(k) service pro-viders over another," Paul Schott Stevens, president and chief executive of the Investment Company Institute, told the committee. The hearing was titled, "The Appropriateness of Retirement Plan Fees." "A highly competitive market has given rise to different business models," Mr. Stevens said. In some plans, he noted, the employer or a consultant assembles different components of plans, such as record keeping, investment management, participant services and compliance. In others, employers engage full-service providers, such as mutual fund companies that manage 401(k) plans, to supply all the services. Three-quarters of plan sponsors use the full-service, or "bundled," approach, Mr. Stevens said. That gives employers a lower cost of contracting, easy access to additional services and the ease of dealing with only one party. Some 401(k) record keepers that do not bundle all services "want Congress to legislate their business model for the entire industry," Mr. Stevens testified. Three bills introduced in Congress — by Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., the House Education and Labor Committee chairman; Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass.; and Sen. Herbert Kohl, D-Wis., chairman of the Senate Special Committee on Aging — would require that fees for bundled services be broken down in disclosures made by 401(k) service pro-viders to plan sponsors. Requiring full-service providers to disclose separate prices for record keeping and investment management, even if both services are provided for a single fee, "is akin to a travel agent that only books airfare lobbying you to require its packaged-tour competitors to break out hotel, transfers and other charges separately," Mr. Stevens said. Congress should "reject this special pleading," he said. Employers who sponsor 401(k) plans should be informed of all payments received by plan service providers, whether directly from plan assets or indirectly from third parties, Mr. Stevens testified. That would enable plan sponsors to judge the reasonableness of total fees and help them identify any potential conflicts of interest. Mutual funds manage more than half of the $4.1 trillion in 401(k) and other defined contribution plans. The ICI's position was backed by the Profit Sharing/401(k) Council of America, which represents plan sponsors. "If a person buys a car, they don't need to know the price of the engine as if it were sold separately," said David Wray, president of the Chicago-based council. Some members of the committee were skeptical of the position that breaking down fees is not necessary for plan sponsors. Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., questioned, "How can you have competition without full disclosure of all the fees?" Tommy Thomasson, president and chief executive of DailyAccess Corp., a third-party 401(k) service provider in Mobile, Ala., agrees with Mr. McDermott. Mr. Thomasson spoke on behalf of the American Society of Pension Professionals and Actuaries and the Council of Independent 401(k) Recordkeepers, two Arlington, Va., groups that represent third-party service providers. "How can anyone have a decision-making process for buying or -purchasing anything ... without disclosure of what is involved in those products or services?" he said in reply to Mr. McDermott's question. "There are currently no rules governing the disclosure of fees charged by plan service providers, and thus disclosure is generally inconsistent and too often nonexistent," Mr. Thomasson said in his testimony. "Any disclosures required of service provider fees to [a plan sponsor] must be provided in a uniform manner regardless of how plan services are delivered." Although Mr. Stevens argued against breaking down costs for plan sponsors, he advocates making disclosures more uniform for 401(k) participants. Workers need a concise summary of investment objectives, historical performances and risks, as well as information about investment managers and fees, he said. Mutual funds disclose all those items, Mr. Stevens said. "But required disclosure of this kind should not be limited to mutual funds," he said. It should include all investment options available to workers in all defined contribution plans. Sara Hansard can be reached at [email protected].

Latest News

SEC bars ex-broker who sold clients phony private equity fund
SEC bars ex-broker who sold clients phony private equity fund

Rajesh Markan earlier this year pleaded guilty to one count of criminal fraud related to his sale of fake investments to 10 clients totaling $2.9 million.

The key to attracting and retaining the next generation of advisors? Client-focused training
The key to attracting and retaining the next generation of advisors? Client-focused training

From building trust to steering through emotions and responding to client challenges, new advisors need human skills to shape the future of the advice industry.

Chuck Roberts, ex-star at Stifel, barred from the securities industry
Chuck Roberts, ex-star at Stifel, barred from the securities industry

"The outcome is correct, but it's disappointing that FINRA had ample opportunity to investigate the merits of clients' allegations in these claims, including the testimony in the three investor arbitrations with hearings," Jeff Erez, a plaintiff's attorney representing a large portion of the Stifel clients, said.

SEC to weigh ‘innovation exception’ tied to crypto, Atkins says
SEC to weigh ‘innovation exception’ tied to crypto, Atkins says

Chair also praised the passage of stablecoin legislation this week.

Brooklyn-based Maridea snaps up former LPL affiliate to expand in the Midwest
Brooklyn-based Maridea snaps up former LPL affiliate to expand in the Midwest

Maridea Wealth Management's deal in Chicago, Illinois is its first after securing a strategic investment in April.

SPONSORED How advisors can build for high-net-worth complexity

Orion's Tom Wilson on delivering coordinated, high-touch service in a world where returns alone no longer set you apart.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.