How singles can use file-and-suspend as an insurance policy

But this creative claiming strategy stumps some Social Security Administration employees.
APR 14, 2015
I have received emails recently asking about the availability of the Social Security file-and-suspend claiming strategy for single people. “I have a single, never-married client, working full time who elected to file and suspend her Social Security benefits at her full retirement age,” wrote Shannon Hannon, a financial adviser with LPL Financial in West Bloomfield, Mich. “The client received a phone call from the Social Security office saying since she isn't married, she can't file and suspend her benefits,” Ms. Hannon said in an e-mail. “I thought any earner is eligible to file and suspend, without regard to marital status.” Ms. Hannon is correct. The ability to file and suspend benefits depends on age, not marital status. But just in case, I checked with the Social Security Administration. “Any primary retirement insurance beneficiary who has reached full retirement age may voluntarily ask that we suspend his or her benefits to earn delayed retirement credits,” SSA spokesman Ben Stump confirmed. “Therefore, the individual in the case scenario provided should be allowed to file and suspend her benefits,” Mr. Stump said. Delayed retirement credits are worth 8% for every year you postpone collecting Social Security benefits beyond the full retirement age, up to age 70. So someone whose full retirement age is 66 could boost their benefits by 32% (4 x 8%) if they waited until age 70 to collect benefits. Someone who was born in 1960 or later and whose full retirement age is 67 could increase their retirement benefits by up to 24% (3 x 8%). Although it is more common for married couples to use the file-and-suspend strategy, it is a viable option for singles, too. For example, someone who is at least 66 years old may want to file and suspend at 66 in order to trigger dependent benefits for a spouse or minor dependent child while his own retirement benefit grows to the maximum amount at age 70. A larger retirement benefit also translates into a larger survivor benefit for a surviving spouse or minor child once the worker dies. But for single people especially, the file-and-suspend strategy can be used as an insurance policy. The premise is to file for benefits at full retirement age, currently 66, and then immediately suspend benefits with the intention of earning delayed retirement credits worth 8% per year up until age 70. But anyone who files and suspends benefits can change their mind at any time up to age 70 and request a lump-sum payout back to the date of the original suspension. Of course, if they did, they would forfeit the delayed retirement credits earned during that period. Why would you want to file and suspend and then request a lump sum? Let's say you're single and had expected to live a long time, but at 68 you receive a terminal diagnosis. Longevity is suddenly the least of your worries and a lump sum payout might come in handy. Because you filed and suspended at your full retirement age, you could request a lump sum payout for the past two years of suspended benefits. Going forward, you would collect Social Security benefits based on your age when you suspended benefits, not larger benefits based on your current, older age. Married beneficiaries could also request a lump sum payout of suspended benefits at any time up to age 70, but it may not be in their best interest to do so. If a higher-earning spouse who had suspended his or her retirement benefits received a terminal medical diagnosis, he or she may be more concerned about leaving the largest possible survivor benefits for the remaining spouse and probably would choose the delayed retirement credits over a lump sum payout. A lump sum payout of suspended benefits does not have to be an all-or-nothing deal. You can request a lump sum for the entire suspension period or for any portion of that period. However, only you can collect a lump sum payout. If you die before collecting benefits, your widow or widower would be eligible for survivor benefits based on what you would have received at time of death, but not a lump sum payout of uncollected benefits. And if you are single, there are no survivor benefits. (Questions about Social Security? Find the answers in my ebook.)

Latest News

Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice
Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice

A $141M judgment and a federal asset freeze collide over one shrinking pool

Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave
Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave

The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.

Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds
Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds

Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.

Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits
Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits

CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.

BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom
BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom

The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.