IRA incentives help savers, but they need to keep a close eye on fees

IRA incentives help savers, but they need to keep a close eye on fees
The programs, including one launched last week by Fidelity, won't make everyday investors millionaires, but they help
MAR 19, 2015
IRA matching and bonus programs won't make everyday investors millionaires, but they help — provided clients faithfully contribute and make intelligent investing decisions. Fidelity Investments last week launched its matching contribution program for individual retirement accounts. The firm has a sliding scale for new or existing customers who transfer Roth, traditional or rollover IRAs to Fidelity: Those who transfer over $500,000 will receive up to a 10% match on future contributions for three consecutive years. Those who bring over smaller amounts are also eligible for a reward: At $100,000, a client can receive a 2.5% match on future annual contributions, while at the $10,000 level, the match is 1%. Direct rollovers out of 401(k)s or 403(b)s aren't eligible. There are other bonus programs out there, too. Sammons Retirement Solutions has a mutual fund IRA product called LiveWell Plus that credits a 3% account bonus on contributions made within six months of opening the IRA. The catch, however, is that clients need to stay in the product for at least six years. Readers might also be familiar with rollover incentives offered at firms that provide retail brokerage services, as well. With respect to rollovers, TD Ameritrade offers existing customers up to $2,500 cash, plus 500 free trades for 60 days. Charles Schwab & Co. recently offered its Schwab Investor Reward — a cash bonus of up to $2,500 for qualifying deposits into a retail brokerage account, including IRA rollovers out of a retirement plan. Retirement researchers noted that encouraging people to save helps even the smallest accounts, but clients need to be aware of additional factors that could erode whatever incentive is offered, including fund fees and, in the case of the brokerage accounts with bonuses, trading expenses. “My suspicion is that you're paying very large fees,” Alicia H. Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, said. “This is an attractive lure, and I think it'll be an effective lure, but it's not clear to me that it will make people better off.” CONTRIBUTION MATCHES VS. FEE REBATING Lauren Brouhard, senior vice president at Fidelity, pointed to three suggestions for clients to get the most they can out of the IRA matching program: make consistent and generous contributions, get invested, and develop a savings plan. “Hopefully this program inspires people to save more, and motivates them to take action now,” Ms. Brouhard said. With respect to fees and their role in longer-term savings plans, she added that “generally speaking, investors should review and compare the different types of fees before making decisions regarding their IRAs or other accounts, where they're doing business, and the products they buy in their accounts.” David Blanchett, head of retirement research at Morningstar Investment Management, noted that if someone were to roll in $500,000 into one of these Fidelity accounts and received the 10% match on $6,500 — the maximum contribution of $5,500 plus a $1,000 catch-up contribution — in the following three years, then the match would only total $1,950. That match would work out to 0.39% of the account value over that three year period. Mr. Blanchett likened the match contribution to a fee rebate, noting “a fee reduction of up to 40 basis points doesn't sound as catchy as a free match.” But the real impact on everyday investors comes from the encouragement to continue funding the IRA and to allow compounding interest to do its work on even modest contributions. “People aren't economically rational, so someone who is hesitant might be encouraged to save more,” said Mr. Blanchett. “To be honest, when I think of who needs to save more, it's the average American — the person who is more geared to receive that retirement savers' credit,” he added. WHO BENEFITS MOST FROM MATCHING PROGRAMS Naturally, the clients with the largest IRAs and the ability to overfund them are the ones who'll receive the best match, but upcoming research from Hearts & Wallets demonstrates that when it comes to workplace savings, middle income earners reap the most benefit from matching programs. For wage earners who make less than $48,000 in income, a 100% employer match at a 6% contribution level will boost the average deferral rate by a multiple of 1.6, compared with workers who didn't have a match according to Laura Varas, co-founder of Hearts & Wallets. For those earning over $96,000 in income, deferral levels held steady, even with the match. The biggest difference was with the individuals who earned between $48,000 and $96,000: They deferred at 2.5 times the rate of the workers who had no employer match. “Low income people are dealing with day-to-day needs, while people earning $96,000 were going to save anyway,” said Ms. Varas. She noted that the biggest hurdle for everyday savers is getting to that first $100,000 in savings. “This isn't very much money for the average account, but it's a behavioral pat on the back” Ms. Varas said of matching programs. DON'T FORGET THE IMPACT OF FEES Just as savings that starts out meager can grow with the help of steady contributions and compounding interest, investors need to be aware of the ill effect high fees can have on those accounts over the long term. “Optimization and giving you the best account value is going to be dependent on the mutual funds that you pick,” said Bill Lowe, president of Sammons Retirement Solutions. “For some people, maybe you want a product that has more value-add to it,” said Ms. Varas. “The point is that as long as you're saving money, it's an exciting innovation. But I agree that you wouldn't want costly funds to undo the benefit [of the bonus].”

Latest News

Clients expect to know if you use AI, but don’t realize that their portfolios are likely exposed
Clients expect to know if you use AI, but don’t realize that their portfolios are likely exposed

Janus Henderson Investors research reveals demand for transparency, but lack of awareness of AI’s prevalence in the corporate world.

Retirement dream looking more like a luxury as cost-of-living squeezes savings
Retirement dream looking more like a luxury as cost-of-living squeezes savings

New research reveals rising expenses, forced early exits, and a widening gap between how long people live and how long their money lasts.

Advisor moves: LPL, Raymond James, Brighton Jones raid the talent pool
Advisor moves: LPL, Raymond James, Brighton Jones raid the talent pool

Firms continue their quest to attract and retain the best advisor teams.

Most advisors say AI portfolio construction is worth $500 a month
Most advisors say AI portfolio construction is worth $500 a month

A survey from TacticalMind AI found 69% of advisors say a high-quality AI platform that makes investment recommendations and constructs portfolios is worth $500 monthly, while research-only tools are valued closer to $250.

CAIS embeds Claude AI into advisor workflows for alternatives intelligence
CAIS embeds Claude AI into advisor workflows for alternatives intelligence

The alts tech provider's latest integration lets advisors query fund data and surface portfolio insights without leaving their primary workspace.

SPONSORED Beyond wealth management: Why the future of advice is becoming more human

As technical expertise becomes increasingly commoditized, advisors who can integrate strategy, relationships, and specialized expertise into a cohesive client experience will define the next era of wealth management

SPONSORED Durability over scale: What actually defines a great advisory firm

Growth may get the headlines, but in my experience, longevity is earned through structure, culture, and discipline