Keep your eyes on the calendar

DEC 15, 2013
By  MFXFeeder
Roth conversion rules allow an investor to re-characterize, or undo, a conversion. This makes sense when the value of the Roth declines substantially, making the tax bite disproportionate to the Roth's value. The government gives Roth converters the choice to reverse any conversion. That re-characterization election may be made anytime before the tax filing becomes final for the year of conversion. For those converting in 2014, that time frame could stretch until October 2015. Thus, if you convert Jan. 4, you will have 21 months to measure performance. Alternatively, if the conversion takes place in November 2014, for example, the maximum time will be cut to 11 months. To further maximize the re- characterization possibility, investors should utilize multiple Roths so that they can keep the one that has performed well and re-characterize the Roths that didn't do so well. One thing seems clear: Anyone who is going to convert should do so in the beginning of the year to give themselves the maximum amount of time to be able to see how the investments perform, and then make the critical re-characterization decision. Incentive options Incentive stock options are thought of more favorably than nonqualified stock options because ISOs can create capital gains, while NSOs create ordinary income. When employees exercise ISOs, no immediate taxable income is created. When an ISO is exercised, a new capital gains holding period is established, with the employee's cost basis being the price paid for the stock (the strike price of the option). The ISO stock holding period begins the day the options are exercised. If the employee holds the stock more than 12 months and recognizes a gain upon its sale, the gain is considered long-term. If the stock is held less than 12 months, the gain is considered compensation and taxed as ordinary income. ISO stockholders, therefore, have an incentive to hold shares at least 12 months. But that creates a dilemma. Should ISO shareholders hold the stock and hope for more gains or should they sell immediately after exercise? The costs of being wrong can be dramatic but not always obvious. If an employee decides to hold the shares, there is the alternative-minimum-tax trap to consider. In calculating the AMT, the difference between the purchase price (option strike price) and the market price is considered income. Importantly, the income is not AMT income if the shares are sold in the same calendar year as the option exercise. This is often confused with the 12-month period necessary to qualify for long-term gains rates. Unfortunately, many employees see the price of their ISO stock crash during the year after exercise as they wait for their shares to go long-term. Without AMT liability, an ISO stock collapse damages the stockholder economically, but not in terms of taxes. In fact, if the shares are sold below the exercise price, the employee could possibly realize a capital loss. But if the ISO option exercise triggers an unforeseen AMT liability, the employees could find themselves owing significant taxes on worthless stock.

A YEAR TO MULL

Because of this, they should exercise their ISOs at the very beginning of the year, giving them a full year to make a sell decision that would have no AMT impact. If the stock falls, the employees should sell before Dec. 31, which will trigger a short-term gain or loss but eliminate the AMT liability. At year-end, if the stock has risen, they can hold for a few more days into January for the 12-month holding period to be achieved, and then sell for a long-term gain. This approach could trigger the AMT, but the economic gain should outweigh the tax liability. By contrast, if an ISO is exercised in October, employees have only a short time before the end of the year to decide whether to sell before Dec. 31 and avoid the AMT or hold for nine months more in order to qualify for long-term treatment. Incentive stock options have proved themselves a wonderful device for motivating employees, but the investments must be managed carefully. In short, exercise in January for maximum flexibility and remember to observe value of the shares that are purchased before year-end, or expect a possible AMT tax bill in the following April. Robert N. Gordon ([email protected]) is chief executive of Twenty-First Securities Corp. and an adjunct professor at New York University's Leonard N. Stern School of Business.

Latest News

The 2025 InvestmentNews Awards Excellence Awardees revealed
The 2025 InvestmentNews Awards Excellence Awardees revealed

From outstanding individuals to innovative organizations, find out who made the final shortlist for top honors at the IN awards, now in its second year.

Top RIA Cresset warns of 'inevitable' recession amid tariff uncertainty
Top RIA Cresset warns of 'inevitable' recession amid tariff uncertainty

Cresset's Susie Cranston is expecting an economic recession, but says her $65 billion RIA sees "great opportunity" to keep investing in a down market.

Edward Jones joins the crowd to sell more alternative investments
Edward Jones joins the crowd to sell more alternative investments

“There’s a big pull to alternative investments right now because of volatility of the stock market,” Kevin Gannon, CEO of Robert A. Stanger & Co., said.

Record RIA M&A activity marks strong start to 2025
Record RIA M&A activity marks strong start to 2025

Sellers shift focus: It's not about succession anymore.

IB+ Data Hub offers strategic edge for U.S. wealth advisors and RIAs advising business clients
IB+ Data Hub offers strategic edge for U.S. wealth advisors and RIAs advising business clients

Platform being adopted by independent-minded advisors who see insurance as a core pillar of their business.

SPONSORED Compliance in real time: Technology's expanding role in RIA oversight

RIAs face rising regulatory pressure in 2025. Forward-looking firms are responding with embedded technology, not more paperwork.

SPONSORED Advisory firms confront crossroads amid historic wealth transfer

As inheritances are set to reshape client portfolios and next-gen heirs demand digital-first experiences, firms are retooling their wealth tech stacks and succession models in real time.