Mary Beth Franklin: No mulligan after claiming spousal benefits early

But sometimes it's smart for one spouse to file before reaching 66
JUL 07, 2013
Readers of my InvestmentNews blogs and columns come up with the best questions! They make me rethink how I can present information about the often-complicated Social Security claiming rules in a clearer fashion. Sarah, a financial adviser in Los Angeles, is one of them. Sarah asked whether a person who claimed reduced Social Security spousal benefits early at age 62 can do anything to restore a higher benefit? Specifically, could she suspend her spousal benefits at full retirement age and wait until age 70 to claim a higher benefit? The answer is no. I'll explain why after reviewing some basic rules. If you collect Social Security benefits early then change your mind, you have two options. Within the first 12 months of claiming, you can withdraw your application for Social Security benefits, repay any benefits you have received (including any other benefits collected on your earnings record, such as spousal or dependent child benefits) and restart your benefits at a higher amount at a later date. Once the 12-month window has expired, you have another option, but you must wait until your full retirement age to exercise it. When you reach age 66, you can voluntarily suspend your benefits, but not repay them. The suspended benefits will accrue delayed retirement credits worth 8% per year up to age 70. For example, if you collect retirement benefits as soon as possible at age 62, you would receive a benefit worth 75% of the amount you could have collected if you had waited until your full retirement age of 66 to file an initial claim. If you later regret your early claiming decision, you could suspend benefits at 66, resulting in a 32% increase in benefits when you resume collecting them at age 70 (4 years x 8% = 32%). At that point, the enhanced retirement benefits would be worth 99% of what they would have been if you collected them initially at age 66 (75% x 1.32% = 99%). But delayed retirement credits apply only to worker's retirement benefits, not spousal benefits. That means the maximum spousal benefit is paid at full retirement age. It is based on half of the worker's primary insurance amount if collected at 66; less if collected earlier. So if a worker is entitled to a $2,000 per month retirement benefit at age 66, his wife is entitled to a spousal benefit of $1,000 per month if she collects it at her full retirement age of 66. But if she collects her spousal benefit at age 62, as Sarah's client did, the spousal benefit would be reduced by 30% to $700 per month. (It gets a bit more complicated if Sarah's client is entitled to both a retirement benefit on her own record and a spousal benefit. She would be paid her retirement benefit first, and then an additional amount to bring her up to the level of her spousal benefit if that were higher). Although Sarah's client could voluntarily suspend her benefits once she reached full retirement age, it wouldn't make sense because spousal benefits do not earn delayed retirement credits. “So she's stuck with the lower amount unless her husband dies and she can claim a potentially higher survivor benefit then?” Sarah replied after I answered her question. (Remember, a survivor benefit is worth 100% of what the worker received or was entitled to receive at the time of his death — including any delayed retirement credits--whereas a spousal benefit is worth up to 50% of the worker's benefit and does not include delayed retirement credits). “Don't think of it as being stuck with a lower benefit,” I responded. “She is lucky the Social Security system allows her to collect benefits as a spouse considering she doesn't have enough work credits to qualify for benefits on her own.” In most cases, the most important decision a married couple can make regarding their Social Security benefits is for the higher-earning spouse to delay claiming benefits until full retirement age or later as a way of maximizing retirement income during their joint lifetimes as well as securing the largest possible survivor benefit. But many times, it does make sense for the lower-earning spouse—or a spouse with insufficient earnings record to collect benefits on her own — to claim Social Security retirement or spousal benefits early as a way of generating some retirement income now and more later. And even though her retirement benefits will be permanently reduced, they will not affect her survivor benefits as long as she is at least full retirement age when she collects them.

Latest News

Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice
Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice

A $141M judgment and a federal asset freeze collide over one shrinking pool

Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave
Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave

The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.

Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds
Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds

Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.

Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits
Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits

CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.

BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom
BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom

The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.