Here's a stunning statement: While an increase in women's workforce participation and average earnings has boosted the income of many American families, it has also reduced household retirement income replacement rates from
Social Security.
“The changing role of women has led to a marked decline in replacement rates that will continue for future retirees,” concluded a new report, How Does Women Working Affect
Social Security Replacement Rates, released by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College on Tuesday.
To understand the connection between higher household earnings and reduced income replacement rates, it helps to review how
Social Security benefits are determined.
A retired worker's benefit is based on an individual's earnings history and a progressive benefit formula that replaces a higher share of pre-retirement income for lower-income workers. A worker's base benefit is calculated at
Social Security's full retirement age (FRA), which is currently 66, and the base amount is then reduced for earlier retirement or increased for later retirement.
In addition to the worker's benefit,
Social Security provides dependent benefits to qualified spouses of retired workers. Even if a wife has no work history, she is entitled to a spouse's benefit equal to 50% of her husband's base benefit. If a woman is eligible to receive a worker benefit based on her own earnings history that exceeds the spouse's benefit, she will receive the larger amount. If her worker benefit is lower, then her benefit is increased to the level of the spouse's benefit.
When most women did not work, it was easy to calculate replacement rates. The wife who claimed spousal benefits at FRA was entitled to an amount equal to 50% of her husband's benefits. So if the replacement rate for the typical worker was 40% of pre-retirement income, the replacement rate for the couple would be 60% (40% + 20% = 60%).
“As women went to work, they increased household earnings more than they increased
Social Security benefits, so replacement rates for married couples declined,” the report said.
Female Gen Xers, born from 1966-1975, entered the labor force at twice the rate of Depression Era women born in the early 1930s. In addition to higher labor force participation, women's wages have increased over the decades.
“As more women entered the labor force and their earnings increased relative to their husband's earnings, a larger percentage of women qualify for worker-only benefits and a smaller percentage receive only spousal benefits,” the report noted.
Household replacement rates have declined from 47% for Depression Era married couples to 45% for Early Boomer couples born from 1948-1953. The trend is expected to continue, dropping to 41% for Middle Boomers born from 1954-1959 and to 37% for Late Boomers and Gen Xers.
“For both the older and younger cohorts, the decline in replacement rates occurs across all income groups, but is a bit more pronounced in the highest income [group],” the report said. “This pattern reflects the influx of highly educated women into the workforce among dual-earner couples.”
The report added that even though younger generation are projected to retire later, this delay is not sufficient to keep pace the increase in the full retirement age from 66 to 67 for those born in 1960 and later.
I think this report is fascinating. The fact that
Social Security benefits will replace smaller amounts of pre-retirement income going forward is just another reason why you should help your clients secure the biggest benefit possible through smart claiming strategies that suit their personal financial and health situation.
