No good reason not to support auto-enrollment retirement plans

55 million American workers without a workplace plan must have the opportunity to get that coverage and start investing. They aren't doing it on their own.
MAY 26, 2018

The financial advice industry should get behind state efforts to enroll workers who don't have access to 401(k) plans in state-sponsored auto-IRA programs. So far, the industry has been less than enthusiastic about plans such as Oregon's version, called OregonSaves, as have many small employers. But early indications are that the Oregon plan is working to the advantage of employers and employees. As of May 1, 750 employers and 44,280 eligible employees have enrolled in the first stage of the rollout. But the U.S. economy and the nation's financial system will be far stronger in the future if the 55 million workers currently without such retirement savings accounts, mostly in small companies, can be provided with a tax-deferred way to save. Many in the industry argue that the state plans are unnecessary because financial advisers will persuade employers to add 401(k)s or other plans, or encourage employees to use individual retirement accounts to save for their retirement. But if those efforts were successful, 55 million employees would not be without coverage. Clearly, marketing or advice from the industry is not going to fix what is the greatest weakness in the U.S. retirement system. The problem is just too great. Nor are individual retirement accounts going to fill the gap. First, many low-income workers have enough difficulty covering their day-to-day expenses without thinking about retirement savings. They fear anything put aside for retirement will greatly weaken their budgets. No one is responsible for explaining the value of the tax deferral to them to make the idea palatable. In addition, relatively little effort is being made to persuade proprietors of small companies to encourage their employees to use IRAs, or to help them do so; employers have little incentive to act. There is even less incentive for employers to contribute to simplified employee pension plans for their employees. Small-business owners are concerned about ERISA's fiduciary rules and possible administrative burdens.

Employers need a push

Clearly, it will take a push, possibly even a mandate, to get the employers of those 55 million workers to provide retirement plan coverage, as distasteful as that might be to many. The U.S. private retirement system has always been voluntary, and business and industry opposition helped sink the Mandatory Universal Private Pension System proposed in 1980 by President Jimmy E. Carter's Presidential Retirement Commission. The country can no longer allow more than one-third of the workforce to go without retirement savings, especially with Social Security benefits likely to be cut around 2030. If the financial services industry and small-business owners do not want to deal with 50 different state plans, they should unite to push for a federal plan that, like the state plans, takes away virtually all of the burdens except enrollment from employers' shoulders. Like many of the state plans, participation could be mandatory (as it is in a similar system in Australia) for any company that does not offer an equivalent or better plan, such as a 401(k). The Department of Labor should work with the states, cities, the financial industry and small employers to design a standard package that would cover these workers with minimal disruption. A common standard would prevent companies from having to deal with different plans if they have operations in more than one state. It's possible the Trump administration will try to block state plans as it has done with city programs, but it will find it has a long fight through the courts on its hands. One way or another, 55 million American workers not now covered by a retirement plan must have the opportunity to get that coverage and start investing — whether by federal or state legislation. The financial advice industry should be part of the solution. What does it have to lose? It's not getting meaningful business from those 55 million workers now.

Latest News

Investment accounts fund nearly 7% of US household spending, JPMorgan finds
Investment accounts fund nearly 7% of US household spending, JPMorgan finds

A new JPMorganChase Institute report reveals how deeply stock market wealth now drives everyday American spending, especially for retirees.

New white paper challenges advisors to rethink solo aging planning
New white paper challenges advisors to rethink solo aging planning

A survey of 507 solo agers finds most lack confidence in their plans and that systems, not just individuals, need to change.

Most Americans need $5,094 a month to retire - and most won't get there
Most Americans need $5,094 a month to retire - and most won't get there

A new Schroders survey exposes a widening gap between what Americans expect in retirement and what they're actually on track to receive.

Advisors get the keys: AdvisorCRM and Zeplyn let firms build their own AI tools
Advisors get the keys: AdvisorCRM and Zeplyn let firms build their own AI tools

Two wealthtech providers are handing advisors the controls, letting firms design their own workflows and AI agents in plain language.

Former San Francisco advisor gets nine-years for running Ponzi
Former San Francisco advisor gets nine-years for running Ponzi

Edwin Lickiss earlier admitted that he defrauded at least 93 victims of over $9.5 million from 1998 through 2024.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income