Nursing homes bleed assets dry: Study

Median household wealth zapped by stay of over thirty days; the good news — once you're broke, Medicare kicks in
DEC 07, 2012
Staying in a nursing home is bad for your financial health. Very bad. A recent analysis by the Employee Benefit Research Institute shows that receiving care in a nursing home drastically depletes assets. Using data from a health and retirement study that's sponsored by the National Institute on Aging and the Social Security Administration, EBRI grouped individuals over age 65 into three segments: Individuals who spent less than 30 nights in a nursing home; those who spent 31 to 180 nights there; and those who spent more than 180 days in such a facility. Median total household wealth for the group that spent less than a month in a nursing facility was $108,300. But the group that spent anywhere from a month to six months at a nursing home had a median total household wealth of $67,836. Wealth plummeted even more for those who spent more than six months at a home, plunging to $5,518, according to the EBRI study. In most cases, Medicare doesn't cover the cost of a nursing home stay, requiring most individuals to pick up the tab themselves. This, in turn, depletes assets until a patient eventually becomes sufficiently impoverished to qualify for Medicaid. Indeed, about half of the individuals who ended up spending half a year at a nursing facility were covered by Medicaid. RELATED ITEM Most expensive states for assisted living » The value of financial assets exclusive of the primary residence also takes a dive. Median financial wealth for people who spend less than a month at a nursing home is $28,510, which declines to $12,562 for people who stay between a month and six months. Financial wealth hits $1,090 for people who spend more than six months at a facility. The results of the study should make the case for long-term-care insurance. But EBRI researcher and study author Sudipto Banerjee noted that of, the individuals who went to a nursing home, only 14% had long-term-care insurance. He also said that when studied over time, respondents become more likely to buy long-term-care coverage when they believe they have a higher probability of moving into a nursing facility. Even then, the number of people who actually buy the coverage remains low. “In 2010, within the group which reported a 50% to 75% likelihood of moving into a nursing home in the next five years, approximately one in four report purchasing such insurance,” Mr. Banerjee wrote. “A possible explanation for this might be that LTCI is expensive.”

Latest News

Advisor moves: Raymond James lands $1.25B team as Merrill loses two
Advisor moves: Raymond James lands $1.25B team as Merrill loses two

Iowa's Greenwood Wealth Partners exits D.M. Kelly as UBS and Ameriprise win Merrill Lynch recruits in California and Florida

Never a losing day: CFTC alleges $950 million forex Ponzi scheme
Never a losing day: CFTC alleges $950 million forex Ponzi scheme

Less than 1% of pool funds went to actual trading, CFTC says

Fintech bytes: Northwestern Mutual picks Jump for enterprise AI
Fintech bytes: Northwestern Mutual picks Jump for enterprise AI

Plus, SEIA builds a governed data foundation for its in-house AI and Snappy Kraken debuts a read-only marketing coworker for advisors.

People moves: AllianceBernstein names Onur Erzan as next CEO
People moves: AllianceBernstein names Onur Erzan as next CEO

Broadridge, Wedbush and Alaris Acquisitions have also filled senior wealth management roles with hires from J.P. Morgan, Osaic and SageView.

SPONSORED In the Age of AI, Trust Becomes the Advisor's Greatest Asset

As AI makes financial information more accessible than ever, Lana Hock explains why human judgment, trust, and empathy remain the qualities clients value most in a financial advisor

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains