Parsing Social Security rules for spouses

Mary Beth Franklin unwraps the puzzle of Social Security claiming options for married couples.
JUL 29, 2013
Recently, I participated in a three-hour All Star Tax training video sponsored by Edward Jones to bring accountants, tax attorneys and enrolled agents up to speed on Social Security rules and claiming strategies. I have been flooded with questions ever since, and I have detected a common misperception about claiming options for married couples. As my regular readers know, I call 66 the “magic age” for claiming Social Security benefits. There are several advantages of waiting until the full retirement age to claim benefits: • A worker is entitled to full retirement benefits. • The earnings cap disappears at full retirement age, so one can continue to work while receiving Social Security with no reduction in benefits. • And by waiting until full retirement age, married couples, as well as divorced spouses in some cases, can exercise some creative claiming strategies to maximize lifetime benefits. The two primary claiming strategies are file and suspend and filing a restricted claim for spousal benefits only. Several professionals who viewed the training video asked if it is possible for both spouses to file and suspend their benefits or for both spouses to file a restricted claim for spousal benefits only. It is a logical question, but the short answer is no. Let me explain why.

File and suspend

When individuals file and suspend, it means that they tell Social Security that they want to file for benefits so that they trigger benefits for their spouse or dependent minor children and immediately suspend their own benefits so that they are worth more when collected. For every year that individuals delay collecting retirement benefits beyond full retirement age, they earn delayed retirement credits worth 8% per year up to 70. So by waiting until 70 to collect, the retirement benefit would be worth 132% of the full retirement age benefit. (Actually, it would be even larger, as intervening cost-of-living adjustments would be applied). File-and-suspend makes sense for traditional couples in which one spouse is the primary earner and the other has little or no work history. In that case, the husband could file and suspend to trigger benefits for his wife while his own retirement benefit continued to accrue delayed retirement credits. The other strategy, in which one spouse files a restricted claim for spousal benefits, works best for dual-earner couples. Once one spouse files for retirement benefits, the other spouse, upon reaching full retirement age, can file a restricted claim for spousal benefits only. That allows the second spouse to collect half of the first spouse's full retirement age benefit while allowing his or her own retirement benefit to accrue delayed-retirement credits.

Can both spouses file?

So can both spouses file and suspend, or file a restricted claim for spousal benefits? No. In order for someone to file a restricted claim for spousal benefits only, the other spouse must claim benefits. Otherwise, there are no spousal benefits available to claim. Similarly, it would make no sense for both spouses to file and suspend, which Social Security wouldn't allow, anyway. It essentially would mean that both spouses would file for a retirement benefit, but by each suspending their benefit, neither would collect anything. However, there is a combination strategy that can help married couples in which both spouses have substantial earnings history to maximize their Social Security benefits. This generally works best when the lower-earning spouse's benefit is worth more than half the higher-earning spouse's benefit. In other words, a wife's own retirement benefit is worth more than she could collect as a spouse. Assuming that both spouses are at least 66, one can file and suspend to trigger spousal benefits for the other, and the second spouse can file a restricted claim for spousal benefits only. So Spouse A would get nothing for four years and Spouse B would get half of Spouse's A's benefit. At 70, they would both switch to their own maximum benefit. It works like this. Say both spouses are entitled to Social Security benefits worth $2,000 per month at their full retirement age of 66. The husband files and suspends to trigger spousal benefits for the wife. She then files a restricted claim for spousal benefits only. For the next four years, the husband collects no Social Security benefits, and the wife collects $1,000 per month, half her husband's full retirement age benefits. At 70, they each switch to their own retirement benefits, which, thanks to four years' worth of de-layed retirement credits, are now worth $2,640 per month. That is 132% of their full retirement age benefits. Together, this retired couple would collect more than $63,000 per year in Social Security benefits, creating a larger base for future annual cost-of-living adjustments. That is real money.

Latest News

Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice
Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice

A $141M judgment and a federal asset freeze collide over one shrinking pool

Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave
Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave

The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.

Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds
Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds

Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.

Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits
Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits

CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.

BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom
BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom

The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.