Putnam Investments is settling a longstanding 401(k) lawsuit for $12.5 million, recent court filings show.
The investment manager was sued in late 2015 by participants in its own 401(k) plan. The plaintiffs alleged the company breached its fiduciary duty by packing the plan menu with Putnam-affiliated investments, rather than competitive third-party funds. Similar claims have been lobbed at numerous investment companies, including American Century, BlackRock, Capital Group, Franklin Templeton, J.P. Morgan, New York Life, TIAA and Wells Fargo.
Putnam initially won at the district court level, with that decision coming in 2017. The plaintiffs then appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit affirmed some of the dismissals granted by the lower court. However, it vacated some dismissals, and those claims were remanded to the district level, where the case has remained up to the settlement.
Under the agreement, Putnam will pay various amounts to roughly 6,000 eligible participants who were in the plan since November 2009, as well as beneficiaries. The total settlement amount will have attorneys’ fees deducted from it at a level to be decided by the court.
The settlement also mandates that Putnam open up its plan to passively managed third-party collective investment trusts. The company also agreed that its plan committee will review investment options at least twice a year.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are represented by law firms Nichols Kaster and Block & Leviton.
University settlement
In a separate case, Emory University has agreed to an unspecified settlement to a lawsuit over its defined-contribution plans, according to court filings made April 16. That case is one of many filed over the past several years against prestigious colleges and universities by law firm Schlichter, Bogard & Denton. Other schools that have faced Schlichter lawsuits include Columbia, Cornell, Duke, Johns Hopkins, MIT, Northwestern and Vanderbilt. The case against Columbia is headed to trial, the law firm announced this month.
In the Emory case, the plaintiffs alleged that the plans were flawed for using three different record keepers – Vanguard, Fidelity and TIAA – rather than just one. Having a single record keeper would have been less confusing for participants and could have saved costs, due to greater bargaining power, the complaint noted. The plans' investment options, including funds from those three record keepers, allegedly had excessive fees, as participants were invested in some cases in retail share classes, rather than institutional ones. The plans' fiduciaries also failed to consider lower cost investment options, according to the plaintiffs.
Further, the 111 different investment options available to participants was unreasonable and made investment decisions confusing, the plaintiffs alleged.
The lawsuit is also one of others that specifically called out the TIAA Traditional Annuity, which had “severe restrictions and penalties for withdrawal if participants wish to change their investments,” according to the complaint.
A $141M judgment and a federal asset freeze collide over one shrinking pool
The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.
Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.
CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.
The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.
Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income
Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.
