Special Social Security rules for public sector employees

Special Social Security rules for public sector employees
Two exceptions can ease the sting of offsets that reduce benefits.
JUN 12, 2019
Questions from readers about Social Security rules and strategies seem to come in waves. The latest tsunami involves Social Security rules for public employees, their spouses and survivors — a total of about 2.5 million people. Although participation in Social Security is compulsory for most workers, about 7% of all workers are not covered by Social Security, according to a new report from the Congressional Research Service. Noncovered workers include state and local government employees, such as teachers, police officers and firefighters, in certain states that provide alternative retirement systems, as well as most federal civilian employees hired before 1984. Noncovered workers do not pay FICA taxes on their earnings. There are two separate provisions that can reduce Social Security benefits for public-sector workers and their eligible family members if the worker receives a pension based on earnings from employment not covered by Social Security. The Windfall Elimination Provision applies to most people who receive both a pension from noncovered work (including certain foreign pensions) and Social Security benefits based on covered employment or self-employment. The WEP affects retired or disabled beneficiaries and their eligible dependents, but it does not affect survivor benefits. A separate provision, the Government Pension Offset, reduces a spouse's or survivor's Social Security benefit if that spouse or survivor also receives a pension based on federal, state or local government employment not covered by Social Security. Public employees in a dozen states, including, Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio and Texas, are affected by the WEP and GPO provisions. So are public employees of some local governments in Georgia, Kentucky and Rhode Island. The WEP can reduce, but not eliminate, a worker's own Social Security benefit by cutting it by up to half of the amount of the noncovered public pension, with the reduction limited to $463 per month in 2019. Affected employees can avoid being whacked by the WEP if they have at least 30 years of substantial earnings in covered employment or self-employment. In 2019, the amount of substantial earnings needed for a year of coverage is $24,675. This amount is adjusted annually. The GPO, on the other hand, can totally wipe out a Social Security benefit for spouses and survivors who also receive a noncovered government pension. The GPO reduces any potential spousal or survivor benefits from Social Security by two-thirds of the amount of the noncovered government pension with no dollar limit. However, workers who pay FICA taxes during their last 60 months of government employment are exempt from GPO reductions. I regularly answer readers' questions about the best way to maximize Social Security benefits, but my friend Maggie recently presented me with the Rubik's Cube of Social Security claiming strategy conundrums. It all started when she told me her husband, a federal retiree, planned to claim Social Security later this summer when he turns 66. My reaction: Not so fast! Maggie is retired, will turn 65 in October, and will be entitled to $2,473 at her full retirement age of 66. Her husband Mike receives a government pension and now works as a self-employed consultant. Mike is eligible for a Social Security benefit of $1,467 per month in August when he turns 66, after offsetting for the WEP reduction. But because he switched from the noncovered Civil Service Retirement System to the covered Federal Employee Retirement System during his last decade of government employment, he is exempt from GPO reductions. I suggested that Maggie file for Social Security when she turns 65 in October and enroll in Medicare at that time. She would receive about $2,300 per month by claiming one year early and would also trigger spousal benefits for Mike. Then Mike, who was born in 1953, could file a restricted claim for spousal benefits and collect $1,236 — half of Maggie's full retirement age amount — while his own retirement benefit continues to grow by 8% per year up to age 70. At that point, Mike would collect his WEP-reduced maximum Social Security benefit of $1,936, beginning in August 2023. Assuming Mike lives to an average life expectancy of 84 and Maggie to 86, this claiming strategy would result in total lifetime Social Security benefits of more than $983,000 according to benefit estimates supplied by Jim Blair, co-founder of the National Social Security Association and Premier Social Security Consulting. That's about $14,500 in additional lifetime benefits compared to the couple's original strategy of having Mike claim his benefit at 66 and Maggie claim her maximum benefit at 70. For those who might think me imprudent to recommend that Maggie claim her Social Security benefit before her full retirement age, rest assured that this couple is entitled to several sources of lifetime income, so outliving their money is not a major concern. But not using the last available Social Security claiming strategy to maximize benefits for workers born before Jan. 2, 1954, is a concern. Check out Mary Beth Franklin's podcast, Retirement Repair Shop.

Latest News

Want to get the most out of alts? You’ll have to do your homework
Want to get the most out of alts? You’ll have to do your homework

Advisors who expect an edge from alternatives' illiquidity premium – without understanding the underlying terms and explaining them to clients – have a world of learning to do.

'Finfluencer' Ponzi scheme defrauds investors of over $20M
'Finfluencer' Ponzi scheme defrauds investors of over $20M

The social influencer Tyler Bossetti pleaded guilty to wire fraud and aiding in the filing of false tax documents as a result of the real estate scheme, which ran from 2019 to 2023 and used platforms including Facebook and YouTube.

US annuity sales see sixth straight $100B+ quarter
US annuity sales see sixth straight $100B+ quarter

The latest LIMRA data release shows continued growth in RILAs, variable annuities, and FRD products, though researchers argue more education is still needed.

RIA moves: Thiel's Indivisible welcomes Ride Wealth Partners, $4B Beacon snaps up Astor
RIA moves: Thiel's Indivisible welcomes Ride Wealth Partners, $4B Beacon snaps up Astor

Indivisible Partners builds on its strategy to take turf in the independent space with its latest move in Colorado.

Advisor moves: LPL adds $425M Evermark Investment Partners, $300M Merril Lynch group hops to Ameriprise
Advisor moves: LPL adds $425M Evermark Investment Partners, $300M Merril Lynch group hops to Ameriprise

LPL's latest addition, a San Diego team defecting from RBC, represents a milestone for the broker-dealer giant's Strategic Wealth model for wirehouse breakaways.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave