State Street this week became the latest investment manager to be sued over the inclusion of its own products in its 401(k) plan.
A group of several plan participants allege in a class-action lawsuit filed Tuesday that the firm breached its fiduciary duty and engaged in prohibited transactions in connection with the funds on the plan menu, including the company’s target-date series.
The plan did not include the lowest-cost share classes of the State Street Target Retirement Securities Lending series, and there were some options from third parties with stronger performance records, according to the complaint.
Returns over one-, five- and 10-year periods lagged the S&P 500 and options available from competitors, in some cases, the plaintiffs noted.
“These funds were not selected and retained as the result of an impartial or prudent process, but were instead selected and retained because defendants benefited financially from their inclusion in the plan to the detriment of the participants,” the complaint read. “By choosing and then retaining these proprietary investment funds, to the exclusion of alternative investments available in the 401(k)-plan marketplace, defendants enriched themselves at the expense of their own employees.”
The $4.5 billion plan included more than 23,000 participants as of the end of 2019. The proposed class includes those who participated in the plan between May 25, 2015 and the present.
State Street declined to comment on the allegations.
The case is in U.S. District Court in the District of Massachusetts. Law firms Scott & Scott and Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane & Conway represent the plaintiffs.
Columbia University will pay $13 million to end a 2016 lawsuit over the school’s defined-contribution plan.
The school reached a settlement in April, but details of the agreement were just recently published. The deal helped avoid a trial that would have commenced days later.
The case centered on allegedly excessive investment-management and administrative fees and was similar to numerous other lawsuits brought against elite colleges and universities over their 403(b) plans. Columbia’s plan, like others, included annuity options from TIAA and Cref that the plaintiffs characterized as restrictive and expensive.
In settling the claims, Columbia denied wrongdoing but agreed to make several changes to its plan, in addition to the $13 million monetary component.
The plan will provide annual training for at least three years for its fiduciaries, continue to negotiate fees on a per-participant basis, rebate excess revenue-sharing fees paid to investments back to participants and seek the lowest-cost share classes of mutual funds and annuities on its menu. It will also seek competitive administrative fees and prevent a plan record keeper from using participant data to cross-sell products and services, according to the agreement.
Plaintiffs in the class-action suit are represented by law firm Schlichter Bogard & Denton, which brought many of the similar cases against colleges and universities. As much as $5 million of the monetary settlement will go toward attorneys’ fees.
A $141M judgment and a federal asset freeze collide over one shrinking pool
The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.
Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.
CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.
The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.
Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income
Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.
