Suit against Vanguard focuses on big tax bills for target-date funds

Suit against Vanguard focuses on big tax bills for target-date funds
Vanguard was forced to sell as much as 15% of the assets in retail target-date funds, resulting in substantial capital gains taxes for investors who held the funds in taxable accounts, the lawsuit asserts.
MAR 15, 2022

Investors in Vanguard target-date retirement funds are suing the company for allegedly mismanaging the accounts and causing them to be hit with excessive tax bills.

In a class-action lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the plaintiffs focus on Vanguard’s sale of a large amount of assets from their accounts in December 2020 to redeem shares that moved from Vanguard’s retail target-date accounts to its institutional accounts.

The migration was caused by Vanguard’s decision to open its institutional funds to all retirement funds with at least $5 million in assets, down from a previous $100 million threshold. Reducing the bar for the lower-fee institutional funds caused an "elephant stampede" out of retail funds, according to a Wall Street Journal story.

Vanguard was forced to sell as much as 15% of the assets in retail target-date funds, resulting in substantial capital gains taxes for investors who held the funds in taxable accounts, the lawsuit asserts.

“The resulting capital gains distributions to investors were unprecedented (40 times previous levels),” the suit states. “While this didn’t hurt retirement plans, it left taxable investors holding the tax bag.”

The suit names three plaintiffs — Valerie M. Verduce of Georgia, Catherine Day of Massachusetts and Anthony Pollock of California — who held Vanguard retail target-date funds in taxable accounts and had tax liabilities of $9,000, $12,000 and $36,000, respectively. The suit says the harm across all retail investors in taxable accounts could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars or more.

“The complaint explains how Vanguard hurt its smaller, taxable investors, so that it could favor its larger retirement plans," Jonas Jacobson, a partner at Dovel & Luner and counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement.

A Vanguard spokesperson declined to comment.

Unlike most lawsuits against retirement funds, this one is based on the tax consequences of a fund's actions rather than its record-keeping fees or conflicts of interest in investment selection.

Vanguard's retail and institutional target-date funds pursued similar investment strategies using different versions of the same index funds. The retail index funds had higher fees than their institutional counterparts.

When Vanguard decided to lower the asset threshold from $100 million to $5 million for retirement plans to invest in the institutional target-date funds, Vanguard didn’t consider the consequences for investors in taxable accounts, said Daniel Wiener, chairman of Adviser Investments.

“This is a major-league screw-up of epic proportions,” Wiener said. “It’s just bad thinking.”

Vanguard should have been using the lower-cost index funds in its retail accounts, he said.

“Had they done that, there wouldn’t have been as big a difference in costs, forcing people to move from retail to institutional,” Wiener said.

Vanguard has developed a reputation for offering low-cost investment products to ordinary investors, a theme established by the firm’s iconic founder, the late John Bogle. The complaint quotes Bogle about his belief in treating investors fairly.

“Over its history, Vanguard has often lived up to that purpose,” the complaint states. “It has become one of the most respected and successful investment companies in the world. But in this case, it has fallen far short. It harmed its smaller, taxable investors (the very people it was founded to serve) to cater to the retirement plans that drive its bottom line.”

Latest News

Investing for accountability: How to frame a values-driven conversation with clients
Investing for accountability: How to frame a values-driven conversation with clients

By listening for what truly matters and where clients want to make a difference, advisors can avoid politics and help build more personal strategies.

Advisor moves: Raymond James ends week with $1B Commonwealth recruitment streak
Advisor moves: Raymond James ends week with $1B Commonwealth recruitment streak

JPMorgan and RBC have also welcomed ex-UBS advisors in Texas, while Steward Partners and SpirePoint make new additions in the Sun Belt.

Cook Lawyer says fraud claims are Trump’s ‘weapon of choice’
Cook Lawyer says fraud claims are Trump’s ‘weapon of choice’

Counsel representing Lisa Cook argued the president's pattern of publicly blasting the Fed calls the foundation for her firing into question.

SEC orders Vanguard, Empower to pay more than $25M over failures linked to advisor compensation
SEC orders Vanguard, Empower to pay more than $25M over failures linked to advisor compensation

The two firms violated the Advisers Act and Reg BI by making misleading statements and failing to disclose conflicts to retail and retirement plan investors, according to the regulator.

RIA moves: Wells Fargo pair joins &Partners in Virginia
RIA moves: Wells Fargo pair joins &Partners in Virginia

Elsewhere, two breakaway teams from Morgan Stanley and Merrill unite to form a $2 billion RIA, while a Texas-based independent merges with a Bay Area advisory practice.

SPONSORED How advisors can build for high-net-worth complexity

Orion's Tom Wilson on delivering coordinated, high-touch service in a world where returns alone no longer set you apart.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.